We’ll be a bit liberal here, and will include descriptions of Donald Trump, his speech, politics, his actions…etc. But it must be related to the man. Other derivations of the word count: dehumanization, dehumanizing, dehumanized…etc.
It must be published by the New York Times (opinion counts too!) and must be in the headline, not subheading. And this must occur after the creation of this market.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ100 | |
| 2 | Ṁ79 | |
| 3 | Ṁ73 | |
| 4 | Ṁ35 | |
| 5 | Ṁ25 |
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/02/us/politics/trump-border-blood-bath.html
Resolves YES?
Edit: nvm, didn't see the market creation date here
@ShadowyZephyr Asking if the NYT would comment on Trump continuing to use the language of genocide, is very different from asking if the NYT would label Trump genocidal. The NYT does not apply those kinds of labels to anyone until well after they've been convicted because they don't want to be sued for slander.
@becauseyoudo it’s about “dehumanizing” not “genociding”. fwiw, your first link would’ve counted, if posted today:
Trump Again Invokes ‘Blood Bath’ and Dehumanizes Migrants in Border Remarks
That was my inspiration to write this market