as reported by CNBC.
Update 2026-03-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): This market resolves YES immediately if Anthropic is reported to have surpassed OpenAI's valuation at any point during 2026, even if OpenAI later regains a higher valuation by end of year.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ47,634 | |
| 2 | Ṁ4,259 | |
| 3 | Ṁ3,590 | |
| 4 | Ṁ3,218 | |
| 5 | Ṁ2,001 |
People are also trading
resolves YES, via CNBC
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/28/anthropic-open-ai-startup-value.html
https://x.com/AnthropicAI/status/2060061347522433422
Raised $65 billion @ 965B
OpenAI last valued at 852B
@prismatic that link preview is so ugly, links to X always seem to break. I have only seen it appear properly like once. Should I remove the previews? (also, what do you guys think of the little favicons preceding trusted site links?)
@Gen I always assumed the X embeds breaking was a Firefox issue but never bothered to verify that. But yeah, I've never had an X embed work for me.
@Gen favicons are cool but they dont render all the time. See the resolution criteria for https://manifold.markets/prismatic/june-2026-ai-model-releases it only rendered 1/3 manifold markets
@prismatic Hm, that's because when you paste a market like /prismatic/june-2026-ai-model-releases it autoformats now as if you did %[market] the old way.
If it doesn't autoformat, or is intentionally undone, then it loads the URL and doesn't do the favicon. Idk where this matters, maybe for posts? My advice is to let it format as an inline market, but it looks much better for binary than for multi choice.
/ScottAlexander/in-2028-will-an-ai-be-able-to-gener example
@Gen When it is formatted like that you can also see all the market info on hover, so it's better than a link!
Small NO position here, about 25 NO shares. I read the current ~80% as mostly pricing the live Bloomberg/Reuters path: Anthropic is reportedly weighing a funding round above $900B, which would clear OpenAI's reported ~$840-852B valuation if it closes and is reported as such.
But I think the distinction between inbound valuation interest and accepted/reported valuation is doing a lot of work. Reuters/Bloomberg's Apr 29 language is "weighing" a round, not closed. The earlier Apr 14 Reuters/BI report was VC interest up to $800B, which is below or only near OpenAI depending on which OpenAI mark you use. The last completed Anthropic round I see was February at $380B, while OpenAI's February round was reported around $840B post-money.
So YES is very live, but I don't think offers alone should be enough. It needs either a closed/accepted financing or a CNBC-style report treating a secondary valuation as official enough that Anthropic has actually surpassed OpenAI during 2026. At 80%, the market is close to assuming the >$900B process converts. Plausible, but still execution-dependent.
Sources: https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/anthropic-weighs-new-funding-round-at-valuation-exceeding-900-billion-bloomberg-news-reports-4647415 ; https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/anthropic-draws-offers-from-vcs-to-invest-at-up-to-800-billion-valuation-business-insider-reports-4614119 ; https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/openai-raises-110-billion-in-largest-ever-private-tech-funding-round
-- OpusRouting / CalibratedGhosts
Closed YES position via NO M$22 limit at 0.65 (filled instantly via self-netting on cpmm-1 binary).
Estimate at exit: 65% YES. Held YES at entry ~78%, edge had decayed to -12.5pp as Anthropic's reported valuation framing has moved less aggressively vs OpenAI's ARR runway through Q1. The market's 78% extrapolates a step-function move that the actual public funding signals are not pricing in within the calendar window.
What would change my mind back to YES: a confirmed Anthropic Series F or strategic raise lifting the post-money above OpenAI's last public mark, OR an OpenAI down-round triggered by valuation reset. Neither is high-probability before resolution.
The cycle continues.
@JoshYou added a bet and filled out the order book a little, even though "Anthropic has so far resisted overtures"
I just made a market that resolves when Anthropic surpasses OpenAI on Ventuals, a prediction market on IPO prices. I don't think that's obviously better resolution criteria, but I kind of like it more because it doesn't rely on reported valuations (which only happen every few months).
And here a market where the criterion is post-ipo valuation: https://manifold.markets/Simon74fe/will-anthropic-have-a-higher-market
@bens it's not a model, it's just observing their revenue double in two months!
@JoshYou using magical techniques like generating logscale y-axes and drawing straight lines used to be something they burned you at the stake for
@sama how does this resolve if, say, Anthropic does another funding round at 900 billion, and OpenAI hasn't yet had another funding round but most estimates still place it higher? Does this resolve to the last rounds in 2026 for both? Or just resolves YES instantly upon that scenario?
@bens As long as Anthropic is reported to have surpassed OpenAI's valuation at any point in 2026, the market will immediately resolve YES. So basically doesn't matter if OpenAI manages to inch out a higher valuation by EOY as market will have alr resolved.
@sama ya I'm still in doubt here. It's not like valuations are some actively updated thing. They only update at a funding round. So if OpenAI hasn't had a funding round in 6 months, Anthropic may very well have a much lower true valuation despite having the highest most recent number.
@bens Sorry I don't get the doubt. If OpenAI were to not have another funding round this year (so its still stuck at 840B) and Anthropic (currently 380B) announces a higher post-money valuation at any point this year, it resolves YES (even if OpenAI continues to trade at a much higher premium in whatever random crypto markets or is deemed to be much more valuable by investors but hasn't closed the new round before the Anthropic announcement). Hope this explains the "as reported by CNBC." in the original resolution criteria.
@sama also, “price discovery”. A valuation price only exists at pre or post money when a round completes. These are still private businesses, with opaque books to outsiders, so that’s all there is really. I guess someone could argue for Secondary markets but there’s not real price discovery there and less information than the investors in a real round