Resolution criterion
This market will resolve to the person who is the President of Venezuela at the close date.
Close date
This market will close at 04:00:00 UTC on 1 January 2027.
Clarifications
If the presidency is abolished, this market will resolve to Venezuela's head of state at the close date.
I will not trade in this market.
Update 2026-01-03 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The market will resolve to whoever is actually in power and carrying out presidential duties at the close date.
An acting president counts if they are genuinely exercising presidential power
The market will not resolve to someone who merely claims the title without actual control (e.g., Juan Guaidó in previous years)
The market will not resolve to Maduro if he is detained in the US at end of year 2026
People are also trading
@a_l_e_x no clue but ya, it was pretty ambiguous always and they elected to go for a counterintuitive clarification that instantaneously moved the odds from like 15% Maduro to 60% Maduro. Not ideal lol
@Mrdudeguy she was barred from participating in the 2024 presidential election so wasn’t a winner. Edmundo Gonzalez is believed to be the true winner
@Mrdudeguy who is going to do that? Maduro's party is still in power; that doesn't change just because the boss got snatched. If you want a new regime you need a revolution. That's probably easier now than before, but far from automatic...
@JussiVilleHeiskanen I'll try to answer all of your questions in one go...
The market resolves to whichever person is president at the close date. If there is no president or head of state whatsoever (which would presumably mean anarchy) I would have to strongly consider voiding the market, although I would like to avoid doing that if I can.
I don't believe there is anything in the resolution criteria to suggest that I should resolve to the most recent president at the close date if that person is no longer in office.
The "Other" option should be read as "any other person not listed here" rather than a catch-all for any other possible scenario. (Otherwise, it would include outcomes that are arguably orthogonal to the question.)
It's hard to say what I will do if there's some kind of civil war or fragmentation of power, because that includes a wide variety of different scenarios. If there is an ongoing conflict between government and rebel forces at the close date, and each side has its own claimed head of state, I would be inclined to resolve 100% to the one recognised by the government unless I have a good reason not to. (But see my earlier clarification about resolving to the person who is actually in power.) I would like to avoid a percentage resolution to this market, but if someone makes the case for one, I will listen
@JussiVilleHeiskanen sorry, it resolves to last president. I really should read the descriptions... bad me


