Will Manifold be mentioned in the New York Times before Oct 16th?
97
940
1.9K
resolved Oct 8
Resolved
YES

Must be in an article, not a podcast, not a transcript of a podcast, the word "Manifold" must appear in the main text of the article (i.e. not in a tooltip or the url of a link that has different text, not as a footnote), and must be referring to Manifold the prediction market website, as we know it, not some other use of the word.

Relevant timezone for "Before Oct 16th" is Pacific time.

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ719
2Ṁ696
3Ṁ380
4Ṁ291
5Ṁ263
Sort by:
predicted NO
predicted NO

I wouldn't be this cavalier with real money, but the idea someone "from" the NYT says "hey, I'm doing this story" is a reliable way to know it will be in print, I don't know what to tell you.

predicted YES

@FrederickNorris I don't know the details, but betters here aren't stupid, it sounds like there has been a lot more communication than that.

predicted NO

@chrisjbillington At some point, I'd take this kind of odds that almost any human interest story will be nixed. It's not like I'm some kind of expert in the newspaper business, I'll admit.

predicted YES
predicted NO

@Joshua 👀

predicted NO

@chrisjbillington There are probably 2-3 people in the world from whom "inside information" on what will actually get printed in the NYT can originate. Bet accordingly.

bought Ṁ0 of YES

My dad heard from some guys at work (he has a NYT job) that most likely publication date is October 9th.

predicted NO

@Joshua Do you realize how much Mana that information is worth????

predicted YES

@Joshua oh no actually my grandpa owns the nyt and saw your dad eavesdropping and so put on a little act for him. Didn't you notice those "guys" were being played by Tom cruise and Brad Pitt?

bought Ṁ20 of NO

I mean just because a reporter shows up to Manifest doesn't mean the finished article gets greenlit for publication. And if it's a deep dive investigation, rather than a quick news beat or fluff piece, that could take awhile

bought Ṁ250 of YES

Related

bought Ṁ55 of YES

Curious if this was priced in already

Thanks for reading, I’ve kept it fairly short as we are expecting pieces from Scott Alexander and NYT which will cover other areas. We also plan to publish more thoughtful “reflections as an organiser” and “how to organise your own Manifest-like event” pieces down the line. We will definitely be farming content from all the talks and may have some response pieces to some of what was discussed!

Source: https://news.manifold.markets/p/wrapping-up-manifest-2023

Is the uncertainty from NYT being slow to publish? Or manifold somehow not being mentioned / or David Chee being mistaken?

predicted YES

I guess not.

predicted YES

@Sailfish Lol, I thought it was widely understood that there was going to be an article soon, thought the pricing here was entirely about the timing.

bought Ṁ20 of NO

@chrisjbillington yeah 10 days seems pretty quick for what would have to be a feature piece, right?

bought Ṁ10 of NO

@ErickBall Just figuring out the whales vs minnows market will take longer than that

predicted YES

I made this market because I saw @SG trading on increased Manifold engagement in October. It takes a minimum of 14 days for new accounts to count as engaged users, so I may have an off-by-one error in my arithmetic but that implies any influx of new users would have to be before about mid-month.

A quicker uptick in engagement among existing users is also a possibility if an article is published later in Oct, as is @SG not thinking too hard about the lag on the engagement numbers before betting (no offence).

(Or obviously, that the bets are unrelated or are a gamble with no insider info)

bought Ṁ0 of YES

smol YES limit up at 10% if anybody wants more NO

would manifest in the title instead of manifold be okay

@lag the title is not part of the resolution criteria, Manifold must be mentioned in the main text (and not only Manifest).

👍

@lag Highly doubt manifest would be mentioned without manifold

@cc6 doesn't seem so unlikely to me, maybe make a market on it