Resolves to firstuserhere's personal judgement, or mine if FUH is gone
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ2,093 | |
| 2 | Ṁ158 | |
| 3 | Ṁ119 | |
| 4 | Ṁ113 | |
| 5 | Ṁ105 |
Seems like:
- if the leadership transition represents OpenAI becoming more x-risk-conscious, then there would be no reason to go more open-source.
- if the leadership transition represents OpenAI becoming LESS x-risk-conscious (ie, just trying to maximize profit), then... there would also be no reason to go more open source. (Surely the profit-maximizing thing to do isn't to give away your fundamental tech for free??)
@JacksonWagner Is open source really more dangerous than closed source at this stage? What grows faster, the ability to understand and preempt risks or the ability to create new risks? At any rate I don’t expect the incumbent to give away its secrets irrespective of x-risk considerations, so I also predict NO.