Update 2025-06-15 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has specified that the "spirit of the question" is about a ground invasion involving troops. A small-scale incursion by special operations forces may not be sufficient for a YES resolution.
1,000People are also trading
@strutheo I've unresolved it, but resolving to N/A seems a bit self serving for you without a strong reason. I'd personally leave it open and see what the actual state of this question is at the end of the year.
Im unsure if spec ops is in the spirit of the question or how I originally intended or or how other people read it, so in absense of a description I usually am ok with na
@Gabrielle There was no description here, meaning the that the most literal interpretation should be followed and we have confirmation by Israel themselves (not that I want to always take them at their word, but it seems appropriate here)
Not to mention previous comments by creator, "foot+ground" did happen.
@Vernas yea but its clearly not troops/soldiers thts my problem
the spirit was more around a ground invasion
idk if spec ops counts in the spirit of what the original intent was
@strutheo You said 1 year ago and the day after the market opened that special forces count. I'm confused how the spirit is now "more around a ground invasion".
@RobertCousineau even when i was saying special forces back then, i think i had something very different in mind
@Emanuele1000 And that's leaving out that Mossad are not soldiers and probably not even Israelis, given what has happened the past few times.
What if it's special forces on a covert mission ?
@strutheo I mean if we hear about it a week later, but they're basically there on a short mission, in and out