I think this is 1k subsidy, not 1M

I'm so pissed about this.

Manifold was lagging and just as I was pressing sell on a market in my portfolio where I had 100 mana... The page shifted. And I sold everything here. And now my account is -7k in balance and a massive profit loss.

@SirSalty Some good user feedback for Manifold here.

Why is this one ranked, but not the bestseller market?

@Simon74fe Honestly I think I just missed it when I was going through and tagging all the big personal goal markets where the creator bet. The guidelines are a little fuzzy but this probably should be unranked, IMO.

english wikipedia?

@sbf Yes!

When do you plan to reveal your identity?

@IsaacKing When it seems relevant. (ex: i publish a bestselling book, write a NeurIPS paper etc, and a proof is a nice gesture to let others validate the claims)

Please prove me wrong :)

So it resolves no if you cease to exist by then but do have a Wikipedia page?

@AndrewHebb Its possible for the page to be made after I am no longer alive, so resolves to NO after the close date if no wikipedia page, or to YES if yes wikipedia page, regardless of dead or alive

@firstuserhere So the statement "If I cease to exist by then, resolves NO." is false.

@AndrewHebb fixed

echo -e $FUH_REALNAME | sha256sum
2ff1e303a51f9601bba580ba37a732478809a9f7e3841c393aff0b90d7477bb8  -

Am I right @firstuserhere?

@chrisjbillington yep

@firstuserhere I won't tell anyone

@chrisjbillington half the people here know 😆 but thanks

@firstuserhere Oh ok lol. And I thought I figured out something obscure!

fyi that's not a very good way of keeping something private. unless you have a very strange firstname or lastname that's very crackable. (i don't think it matters here though)

@jacksonpolack I do have a relatively rare firstnamelastname combo, and i'm not trying to hide the name anymore, really

@jacksonpolack I think it might be borderline rare enough, but fair point. Should have concatenated it with his mother's maiden name and government ID number to be sure.

@chrisjbillington aha! so its a him! oh wait.. its me lol

Needs to stay up for >3 consecutive weeks at least.

This might be too low, 3 weeks is enough for someone who's committed enough to just try multiple times and wait for wiki procedure to be slow

But other than that, it's not that easy to get a wikipedia page. Plenty of influential rationalists don't have wiki pages. I don't think any of the AI interpretability people have wiki pages

@jacksonpolack hmm I have no idea about Wikipedia guidelines. I'll look into it and see if 3 weeks minimum is a sensible duration. The spirit/point is that it needs to not be taken down immediately or just be up for the sake of manipulation of markets

there's not really a guideline for how long an article should stay up, it's mostly just how long it takes volunteers to go through the process of deciding if it's sourced or not and then actually getting to taking unsourced article down.