@Quillist should be "children of illegal immigrants", since illegal immigrants have already been born and therefore cannot get birthright citizenship.
@VNetChrome lie, definitely. but grift? he might be a bit busy rewarding his friends. how would you want this resolved?
@Marnix Day 1, inauguration. There’s already an established history, lawsuits, AND Settlement (ie admission of guilt). As given as the “Lie” part
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/03/1096123493/trump-inauguration-dc-hotel-lawsuit-settlement
https://www.citizen.org/news/what-happened-to-the-surplus-funds-from-trumps-inauguration/
@b575 this will be decided by the creator but to interpret "taking an action that eventually leads to resource constraints that force one side to the bargaining table" as a day 1 action to "end the war" would be pretty nuts imo.
this is about direct actions he can take, not attributing causality for (complex, multicausal) future events to the day 1 actions that may have influenced them. if trump gets on the phone with putin/zelensky and negotiates the end to the war on day 1, that resolves YES.
@Ziddletwix I mean, yes, if it merely led to resource constraints it wouldn't qualify. But I predict that's not what will happen.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/biden-first-day-in-office-eo-2-SgWyvMIdQ4Guj0y17x646A
Basically this list in reverse
@Quillist If Jack Smith resigns before Trump takes office, would this resolve NO or N/A? I think it should be NO.
edit: I need to slow down and read. From your other comment, I take it this would resolve N/A.
@Quillist wait if he signs a peace agreement on Day 1, wouldn’t that have to resolve NO or N/A since he didn’t negotiate it?