Update 2025-16-01 (PST): • Day One is defined as 24 hours after being sworn in as President. (AI summary of creator comment)
Update 2025-16-01 (PST): - If an action occurs prior to Trump taking office that makes it impossible to resolve yes, the market will resolve as N/A. (AI summary of creator comment)
1,000
3.00Looks like Ross was pardoned at some point today
@Marnix It seems to me that the j6er pardon issues a pardon to every j6er not named as a recipient of a commutation. I don't think that should count towards "named people," explicitly due to the language of it.
@Marnix yeah, for this, I am considering only five different people named on five different pardon warrants
@AaronSimansky I'd personally be fine with 5 different named people on less than five pardon warrants (since there's a non-zero chance unrelated pardons get bundled together), but a group pardon like that one, definitely not
@SahilDeshmukh I ve listed (in comment section) the plethora of facts directly proofing LIES (just on inauguration speech) AND Inauguration GRIFTS (meme COINS, private Trump Vance Inauguration Committee hauls, Trump National Golf Inauguration event, Gold Edition Inauguration Day Bible Licensing fees…)
In light of direct parallels to 2017 Inauguration Fund Fraud cases where there was an admission of guilty via Settlements (eg Fraudulent Trump Hotel charges to Inauguration Fund) plus the additional Licensing Fees, meme coins (gray area)… I don’t see how these can be overlooked and resolved to anything but Yes
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/historic-grift-trump-memecoin-creates-145950269.html
Including and not limited to “Day 1”
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-new-crypto-coin-sparks-ethics-concerns-2025-01-20/
Past 8 yrs AND Ongoing/Accelerating
@SahilDeshmukh were there LIES (statements not supported by FACTS or contrarian to established FACTS)
Were there proven direct monetary gains beyond, but as a result, of the Presidency?
BOTH of the above within Day 1
Supported by reputable, non-partisan media reporting
All references listed above r not subjective to me. The legal Settlements (admission of guilt) from 2017 Inauguration Grifts were not subjective and took 3 years. We have parallel Inauguration activities performed (and then some) 8 yrs later (ie Trump Hotel vs Trump National Golf + personal benefiting licensing agreement directly pertaining to the act of Inauguration + PERSONAL BENEFITING meme coins coupled with Day 1 SEC order of “crypto task force”, coincidence?)
@Quillist Much in the same vain as he did not unban TikTok, he did not terminate any projects. Is this a fair assessment?
@GazDownright I don't think it is a fair assessment. You can always be needlessly specific with the criteria: would this only resolve YES if he personally ran out to an offshore wind farm and tore down the turbines himself? Absurd.
He signed an executive order with the explicit intention of terminating offshore wind projects! This obviously qualifies as YES imo @Quillist
@benshindel and in case it isn't obvious: the start of Jan 21st is indeed within 24 hours of him taking office!
@benshindel What's clear is that this is a temporary pause, for now. A temporary stop for review means commercial actors will need to hold off for a while. Haven’t you worked at companies where a project you’re involved in gets paused, only to resume later? I have. Pausing something doesn't equal terminating it.
In 2021, the Biden administration temporarily paused new oil and gas leases on federal lands for environmental review, but later resumed them after legal challenges.
@Calibrate It also counts as a lie, because he claims that his first day is "not over yet" well after midnight
@TiredCliche Ha! That last one is a real strawclutcher, my friend. However, he did lie when he said 30,000 Americans died making the Panama Canal. The numbers are closer to 6,000, and it was predominantly Caribbean migrant workers. See the Guardian's fact-checking for more lies.
@Odoacre Does this count?
It doesn't fully remove the ban, just delays enforcement for 75 days.
@TimothyJohnson5c16 I know you're not asking me, but in my opinion this would only count if he actually repealed, not delayed the implementation of the ban, like he did. It might later lead to it being undone entirely, but did he then do it on Day 1?