Between inauguration day and the end of the year.
‘Go after’ in the sense of making their lives difficult in some public way, causing them financial hardship, etc.. In most cases, a post or something spoken during an interview only will not count, will have to be accompanied by some specific action. I will be the final judge of any edge-cases but will read any sources or arguments made in the comments.
Let’s see where this goes. N/As on added items that are ridiculously broad or way too difficult to prove.
If not elected, not elected resolves yes, everything else no immediately after election results.
Update 2025-02-01 (PST): 'Going after someone' includes actions taken against loyalists, such as Liz Cheney & Jan 6 Committee. (AI summary of creator comment)
1,000since the criteria includes financial hardship: these birds are singled out for tariffs as the only residents of their island! https://www.wired.com/story/trump-tariffs-antarctic-islands-heard-mcdonald/
why was 'Universities' resolved?
Joe Biden, Alexander Vindman, Liz Cheney all had their security clearances revoked. Doesn't necessarily count as something that "makes their life harder," for Vindman, as he hasn't had active clearance for years but I would argue this should be a YES for Cheney (attorney) and probably Biden, too as the point of revoking his clearance is specifically revenge.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114205890583765400
You can't make this shit up
@Marnix supposedly withdrawing SS protection of adult children https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden-trump-secret-service-ashley-50eba3fcd1ef9d2580fb4bc464d229f6
Limit order at 61% YES if anyone's interested
Plus actions happening regarding pulling US support and punishing Ukraine for being invaded.
@Predictor is there a reason not to resolve this? He’s verbally insulted and taken real actions against Zelenskyy https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/02/24/politics/us-joins-russia-ukraine-un-vote
@Marnix oh, it's actually even sillier https://bsky.app/profile/daralind.bsky.social/post/3lhzapaqjzk2d
who's the most likely candidate here? maybe somehow trying to influence @LuigiMangione's sentence in a harsher direction?
@Robincvgr I don't think so, nobody would say the previous administration 'went after' Trump when they removed his security clearance. Plus, this doesn't make Biden's life more difficult.
@Predictor is this enough for a yes? https://www.axios.com/2025/02/06/trump-politico-subscriptions-doge-elon-musk
@Predictor this should resolve YES imo. He has now sued: ABC, CNN, CBS
https://pressgazette.co.uk/media_law/trump-lawsuits-media/
These are clearly SLAPPs (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), meant to be costly and threatening rather than anything with legal standing
@Predictor ah ok, guess we'll have to wait a bit for another one then. I suppose you're not yet counting the FCC releasing the unedited CBS interview
@Siebe Not really yet, I think he just made a post about it? Don’t worry, I’m sure there will be something any day now.