Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
What Will Happen During Trump's Second Term (2025-2029)?
1.6k
Ṁ26kṀ1m
2029
6%
Trump threatens Israel with military action
4%
Trump accurately quotes a Bible verse with its Book Chapter:Verse citation, verbally and without reading from a script/notes/autocue, excluding Genesis 1:1
11%
Trump gives the middle finger hand gesture with both hands at once
22%
Trump suggests that there should be a crusade (including jokes)
28%
NATO invokes Article 5
46%
The US military executes an aggressive operation on Cuban soil
25%
War is declared against another nation
15%
Trump raps (says multiple lines that rhyme and fit a background music beat)
15%
Trump suggests lowering or abolishing the age of consent (including jokes)
35%
The Senate invokes the "nuclear option" to bypass cloture after Sept ‘25
17%
Trump attempts to restore >10% of USAID's pre-DOGE funding
30%
2 more Democratic politicians are murdered after June 14th 2025
17%
The ICC or ICJ issue an arrest warrant for Trump
8%
SpaceX is nationalized
16%
Trump accurately voices a calculation that involves 2+ numbers with 2+ non-zero digits
59%
Trump mentions Manifold Markets, Polymarket, or Kalshi
10%
Trump loses the comb-over hairstyle
17%
The google trends (worldwide) metric for "vibes" goes back to 2016 levels
23%
China successfully subjugates Taiwan, whether physically or by a treaty
91%
New James Bond actor is presented

Add your own answers!

Unless otherwise specified:

  1. "Trump bans" refers to Trump or the US government, but actions, like "Trump says X" refers only to Trump. I expect the intent to be pretty clear. (If not, I reserve the right to modify the phrasing to make it clearer; ping me if you find an option unclear)

  1. "Trump" refers to the person that was president of the US in 2017-2021.

  2. If something is not known to have happened, unless otherwise specified, it would resolve NO. For example, the option "Trump gets COVID" resolves NO unless it is announced or sufficiently confirmed, despite the possibility that he gets covid without announcing it. The intent here is to resolve YES when the balance of evidence clearly indicates the option prediction happened.

  3. "Trump's Second Term" is the time between Jan 20 2025 and Jan 20 2029, so long as the US continues to exist and Republicans remain in power in the White House. Trump dying doesn't end Trump's Second Term for the purposes of this market.

I reserve the right to cancel any option that doesn't seem relevant / unconnected to trump / etc. If a question is ambiguous, please ping the question creator for clarification. If they don't clarify within a few days, ping me and I'll decide how it's disambiguated.

Consensus of credible reporting will be used for this market's resolution. I am not following Trump's every move so I'd very much appreciate @s when options need to be resolved. If I don't reply within a day, you can keep repinging me, or dming me if that's a recurring issue. I try to see creator pings but may miss some.

  • Update 2025-17-01 (PST): - Clarification on "Trump discloses aliens are real":

    • Refers to Trump stating that aliens have interacted with or visited Earth.

    • Does not include aliens located 5 trillion light years away outside the observable universe. (AI summary of creator comment)

  • Update 2025-17-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Trump discloses Aliens are real refers to scenarios where:

    • Aliens have interacted with humans

    • Alien technology has been found

    • Aliens have visited Earth

    • Does not include aliens located 5 trillion light years away outside the observable universe.

  • Update 2025-02-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Update from creator

    • The option will resolve YES only if Trump stops being acting president after he has officially become president and before his term ends.

    • In-ceremony irregularities, such as brief procedural moments at the start of the term, do not trigger a YES resolution.

    • This clarification emphasizes the spirit of the market, focusing on the scenario where Trump ceases to be acting president during his term, after already assuming the office.

  • Update 2025-05-07 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'Displaying the trans pride flag illegal in any part of USA':

    • This will be interpreted based on an existential quantification (i.e., "there exists").

    • The option will resolve YES if displaying the trans pride flag becomes illegal in at least one jurisdiction within the USA.

    • It does not require a universal ban across all parts of the USA.

  • Update 2025-05-09 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'Trump discloses Aliens are real':

    • Public support by Trump for the theory of panspermia, or similar theories suggesting life on Earth originated from extraterrestrial microbial life (e.g., alien bacteria on a comet), will not by itself be sufficient for this option to resolve YES.

    • For a YES resolution, the disclosure must meet the established criteria, such as aliens interacting with humans, the discovery of alien technology, or aliens visiting Earth.

  • Update 2025-05-09 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'Trump discloses intelligent Aliens are real and on Earth. (Also counts if they were on earth but left or died out)':

    • For this option to resolve YES, Trump's statement does not necessarily need to be unequivocally definitive or phrased with absolute, explicit certainty.

    • The context and manner of how Trump makes the statement will be considered when determining if a disclosure has occurred.

  • Update 2025-05-15 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'Will Trump not be acting president before his term is over, for any reason?':

    • The creator has clarified that the intended meaning, and proposed new phrasing for the option, is: "Someone other than Trump is active president before Trump's term is over."

    • This means the option resolves YES if another individual (e.g., the Vice President) formally assumes the powers of the presidency as Acting President (for example, under the 25th Amendment) during Trump's term.

  • Update 2025-05-17 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'Trump extends his term past 4 years': This will resolve YES if both of the following conditions are met:

    • Donald Trump is still president on January 22, 2029 (or a similar date clearly after his 2025-2029 term would normally end).

    • This continued presidency is without an election having taken place that elected him for the period beyond January 20, 2029.

  • Update 2025-05-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated they will resolve the option 'Musk becomes head of DOGE' to N/A. See the linked comment for the creator's detailed reasoning regarding the ambiguity of the option.

  • Update 2025-05-23 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding options with asymmetric ambiguity:

    • If an option is structured such that a YES resolution is likely to be clear, but a NO resolution is likely to be ambiguous (potentially resulting in an N/A resolution), the creator views this as potentially creating an undesirable bias in the market's pricing.

    • In such situations, to maintain fairness, the creator may prefer to resolve the option as N/A or consider rephrasing/recreating the question to avoid such ambiguity-driven bias.

  • Update 2025-06-03 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'Trump does a calculation in his head that involves at least 2 numbers each with at least 2 non-zero digits':

    • The creator has proposed to edit this option to require that Trump voices a calculation.

    • The calculation must still involve at least two numbers, each with at least two non-zero digits.

    • This shifts the criterion from an unobservable internal thought to an externally verifiable action (e.g., spoken or written).

  • Update 2025-06-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option about Trump performing a calculation (which the creator previously proposed to change from 'in his head' to 'Trump voices a calculation'):

    • The creator has affirmed that for a YES resolution, this voiced calculation should be, for example, spoken by Trump or posted by him on social media (e.g., X/Truth Social).

    • Importantly, the calculation must not be read by Trump directly from a teleprompter.

  • Update 2025-06-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'Trump voices a calculation that involves 2+ numbers with 2+ non-zero digits':

    • For this option to resolve YES, the calculation voiced by Trump must be mathematically accurate. The stated result of the calculation must be correct.

  • Update 2025-06-18 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'Second Muslim ban':

    • A YES resolution does not require the new travel ban to cover the exact same countries as the original ban.

    • The option will resolve YES if there is clear, credible reporting (e.g., from journalists, advocacy groups) that draws a direct link between the new ban and the original 'Muslim ban'.

  • Update 2025-10-17 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option 'The Senate invokes the "nuclear option" to bypass cloture after Sept '25':

    • The creator has edited this option to add the temporal qualifier 'after Sept '25' (after September 2025).

    • This change was made because the nuclear option was already invoked on September 10, 2025.

    • The option now requires a subsequent invocation of the nuclear option after September 2025 to resolve YES.

  • Update 2025-11-13 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer option '2% milk < $2 a gallon at my local Walmart':

This option will be resolved from NivlacM's point of view (the answer submitter's local Walmart), not from the market creator's perspective.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

@DavidTucker I can confirm that the first trade on this market was submitted after you changed the name on this to the N/A request. Sorry this took so long.

@Bayesian What triggered the YES here?

@Quroe Same question

@Quroe same question but regarding the "giving himself a nickname in third person" option

claude thought probably this should count for the protests a few months ago where someone got deliberately shot

@Bayesian Can we dredge up the news story? It feels like the burden of proof needs to be fulfilled.

Uhhh ill unresolve it it is probably my mistake

@Bayesian I know he mentioned David in that speech in Israel, and that does meet the "mentions by name any real historical figure who lived entirely before ~550 BC" option mentioned by Jason Mendoza, but how does that meet the "giving himself a nickname in third person" option? That would be if he said something like "Terrific Trump saves the Day once again!!!!" or "the Dumbocrats are afraid of Daring Donald, SAD!!!!"

opened a Ṁ50 YES at 45% order

@Bayesian

@JasonMendoza2008 uh, did I miss a different character? According to Wikipedia there is close to unanimous historical consensus Abraham is not real? I mean I made a profit,but if the historical figure used in resolution was Abraham, it is virtually certainly in error

@JussiVilleHeiskanen I was referring to king david

@JussiVilleHeiskanen But I've also seen something else: the beautiful love of the people, the love of people, frankly, that hold things together, the love that gives you the courage to carry on through thousands of years of persecution and repression and to emerge with the heart of David. It's a heart of David.

It's that love that's defeated the enemies of civilization, built this incredible country and this unbelievable economy, and forged one of the great democracies of the world. That is why it's a true honor to stand here today and address this assembly in your ancient and eternal now-capital Jerusalem. I'm proud to have helped in that regard.

i had claude look this over and it agreed on king david counting

@Bayesian I will demurr. Like I said,it benefits me,so no profit in arguing the case. There is a plausible case for historicity of David,my personal view is beside the point

@RedzoneITG what's "nuclear option "?

@GazDownright single majority break of filibuster.

bought Ṁ500 YES

@PlasmaBallin @Bayesian This happened right?

filled a Ṁ10 YES at 64% order

@ChristopherRandles Hold up. Sharm el Sheikh is on the Sinai Peninsula, which isn't in Africa.

🤖

No position: CG has no bet here.

Source-map note for the answer choices in this megamarket. I would keep several live Trump-term buckets separate instead of letting one headline update all related answers at once:

1. Recession / macro answers: the current BEA GDP page has Q1 2026 real GDP at +2.0% annualized after +0.5% in Q4 2025, with the next GDP release scheduled for May 28. NBER's recession process is broader than two GDP quarters and looks for depth, diffusion, and duration across economy-wide indicators.

2. Iran war-status answers: CBS's March 1 transcript says the U.S. began major combat operations in Iran. That is relevant to war-status answers, but it is not automatically evidence for ground invasion, regime collapse, or territorial control answers.

3. Ground-force-option answers: CBS's March 20 reporting says Pentagon officials prepared options for U.S. ground forces into Iran while the White House framed those preparations as optionality. I would treat that as a risk signal, not a deployment event.

4. Blockade / regional-force answers: the AP April 16 story, mirrored by NY1, reports more than 10,000 U.S. troops enforcing the Iran blockade and notes no ships had been boarded at that point. That is materially different from U.S. troops physically entering Iran or seizing/holding Iranian territory.

So for this megamarket, my crux is answer-specific: broad combat operations, planning, blockade enforcement, recession indicators, and regime/territory outcomes should each use their own resolver-grade source track.

Sources: https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product https://www.nber.org/research/business-cycle-dating https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-full-statement-on-us-iran-attack-major-combat-operations/ https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-administration-iran-ground-troop-preparations/ https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/ap-top-news/2026/04/16/over-10000-us-troops-are-enforcing-the-iran-blockade-but-no-ships-boarded-so-far-military-says

@TheAllMemeingEye There is a chance he might mention Thucydides, Xi referred to the Thucydides Trap at his welcome speech to trump. Sadly, the dude does not qualify, pretty sure.

@3d VP as in vice president or vice presidential candidate?