
If Artificial General Intelligence has an okay outcome, what will be the reason?
344
17kṀ160k2200
16%
We create a truth economy. https://manifold.markets/Krantz/is-establishing-a-truth-economy-tha?r=S3JhbnR6
15%
Yudkowsky is trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and fortunately all of his mistakes have failed to cancel out
14%
Eliezer finally listens to Krantz.
11%
AIs will not have utility functions (in the same sense that humans do not), their goals such as they are will be relatively humanlike, and they will be "computerish" and generally weakly motivated compared to humans.
8%
Alignment is not properly solved, but core human values are simple enough that partial alignment techniques can impart these robustly. Despite caring about other things, it is relatively cheap for AGI to satisfy human values.
7%
6%
Humans become transhuman through other means before AGI happens
4%
Humanity coordinates to prevent the creation of potentially-unsafe AIs.
3%
Power dynamics stay multi-polar. Partly easy copying of SotA performance, bigger projects need high coordination, and moderate takeoff speed. And "military strike on all society" remains an abysmal strategy for practically all entities.
2%
Almost all human values are ex post facto rationalizations and enough humans survive to do what they always do
1.9%
AIs never develop coherent goals
1.2%
"Corrigibility" is a bit more mathematically straightforward than was initially presumed, in the sense that we can expect it to occur, and is relatively easy to predict, even under less-than-ideal conditions.
1.2%
A lot of humans participate in a slow scalable oversight-style system, which is pivotally used/solves alignment enough
1.1%
AGI is never built (indefinite global moratorium)
1%
An AI that is not fully superior to humans launches a failed takeover, and the resulting panic convinces the people of the world to unite to stop any future AI development.
1%
ASI needs not your atoms but information. Humans will live very interesting lives.
Duplicate of https://manifold.markets/EliezerYudkowsky/if-artificial-general-intelligence with user-submitted answers. An outcome is "okay" if it gets at least 20% of the maximum attainable cosmopolitan value that could've been attained by a positive Singularity (a la full Coherent Extrapolated Volition done correctly), and existing humans don't suffer death or any other awful fates.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
If Artificial General Intelligence has a poor outcome, what will be the reason?
If Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has an okay outcome, which of these tags will make up the reason?
When artificial general intelligence (AGI) exists, what will be true?
Will artificial general intelligence be achieved they the end of 2025 ?
19% chance
The probability of extremely good AGI outcomes eg. rapid human flourishing will be >24% in next AI experts survey
59% chance
Will General Artificial Intelligence happen before 2035?
69% chance
Will the control problem be solved before the creation of "weak" Artificial General Intelligence?
6% chance
Who first builds an Artificial General Intelligence?
If AGI has an okay outcome, will there be an AGI singleton?
25% chance
If we survive artificial general intelligence, will Isaac King's success market resolve to "none of the above"?
59% chance