When artificial general intelligence (AGI) exists, what will be true?

300Ṁ69

3000

62%

If more than one AGI individual exists, they are generally friendly to each other.

59%

More than one AGI individual exists at the time the public finds out that AGI exists.

59%

AGI has a significant beneficial effect on Earth's climate.

59%

AGI generally has a sense of morality that humans can comprehend.

54%

AGI is generally friendly to humans.

54%

AGI is generally under the control of humans.

54%

AGI generally views humans as equal in moral worth to AGI.

50%

Humans are generally under the control of AGI.

50%

AGI has a significant detrimental effect on Earth's climate.

50%

AGI generally avoids interfering with humanity.

50%

AGI attempts to make humans more like AGI.

38%

Humans are generally friendly to AGI.

Feel free to add more answers. This market will be resolved by a poll or another appropriate method if/when the time comes. I may bet on this market.

World

AGI

AI risk

Artificial Intelligence

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

Will we get AGI before 1M humanoid robots are manufactured?

67% chance

Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is possible in principle

89% chance

What will be true about the person who creates AGI?

Will we have an AGI as smart as a "generally educated human" by the end of 2025?

26% chance

Will Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) lead directly to the development of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI)?

78% chance

Will AI create the first AGI?

41% chance

What will be true about the first AGI that becomes accessible to everyone? [ADD MORE]

By when will we have AGI?

Will we get AGI before 2041?

81% chance

Will artificial general intelligence be achieved they the end of 2025 ?

Sort by:

How are you defining AGI?

@MugaSofer In general, I think AGI can be defined as artificial intelligence with a human-level or greater capability that can apply its intelligence to general problems and situations independently.

For the purpose of this market, I think it's best to leave the definition to the time of resolution. Meaning that if/when someone claims that AGI exists and the question should be resolved, the polls (or similar) ask both if AGI exists and if the relevant statements are true.

This is a market with no set resolution, where a lot of results cause Manifold and/or its users to no longer exist to win their bets.

@NathanF While it's true that the market may never resolve, I don't think any of the answers would necessarily mean Manifold or its users would no longer exist. I think all possible resolutions for this market (given the currently existing answers) could theoretically be true while Manifold and its users survive. Even if AGI exists and is not friendly to humans, for example, it doesn't necessarily mean it would exterminate all Manifold users or destroy Manifold.