Wasn't sure if this should be extended or not given the answers, not all of them specify end dates.

@CaelumForder Resolves NO.

https://x.com/DimitrisPapail/status/1898731096944128486

@CaelumForder is there a word missing? Perhaps laid-off?

@MartinVlach I think what's meant is that the person joining's last employment has been with OpenAI

@MartinVlach yeah what @Big0h said, maybe they left, maybe they were fired, sabbatical etc. Just most recently it was OpenAI they were employed at

@MartinVlach Probably should say "recent OpenAI employees"

@CelebratedWhale

https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/openai-co-founder-sutskevers-new-safety-focused-ai-startup-ssi-raises-1-billion-2024-09-04/

They’ve raised $1B at reported $5B valuation. Article also reports company is for-profit.

@nikstar holy shit, Ilya got VC rizz

Why's the chance of this exactly the same as them solving alignment?

Because both are actually 0%.

@CelebratedWhale what's the timeframe for this option?

Indefinite, I will extend the market timeframe

can it ever resolve no?

Yes, if the company is no longer pursing SI, or another company invents SI first. By create I meant invent so I'll clarify in case that was unclear to anyone. If any of the 3 ppl who voted yes understood it differently, pm me

ah thanks for clarification

WE'RE SO BACK

@CelebratedWhale could you change by with before or by end of? "by" is ambiguous in english