In the case of Counterman v. Colorado, will the Supreme Court decide that a statement is a "true threat" only if the speaker knows subjectively or intends the threatening nature of the statement? Here is the question presented.

This market resolves YES if the Court's decision requires the speaker's intent or subjective judgement to be considered when regarding speech as a "true threat." This market resolves NO if the Court decides that an objective "reasonable person" regarding the statement as a threat is sufficient. If the decision remands the case to a lower court or is ambiguous about the role of intent, this resolves N/A.