This term, the Supreme Court will look at Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. At issue is whether the court should overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency.
If Chevron is overturned OR the court clarifies that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency, this question will resolve YES.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ112 | |
2 | Ṁ108 | |
3 | Ṁ44 | |
4 | Ṁ27 | |
5 | Ṁ26 |
"Held: The Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, and courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous; Chevron is overruled" Wow ok that's not ambiguous