Context:
This will resolve positively if Max Tegmark or FLI (in official capacity) make a public statement about this controversy, and clearly declare in this statement that no such letter has been signed or sent by Max Tegmark.
For example, FLI/Tegmark could allege that the letter was forged by the swedish right-wing org or expo.se or someone else.
The letter refers to the letter of intent, which was talked about in the above article from expo.se, and which offered/promised a grant to a swedish org.
The statement has to occur before market close (which is intended to be Feb 14th).
If I find no comment linking to such a statement and cannot find such a statement after a short google search, then I will resolve negatively.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ23 | |
| 2 | Ṁ21 | |
| 3 | Ṁ7 | |
| 4 | Ṁ5 | |
| 5 | Ṁ4 |
@harfe You don’t seem to have resolved one incorrectly either, so proceeding with tit-for-tat in iterated gameplay seems like a pretty viable strategy. If I’m proven wrong, I’m proven wrong.