Refers to the donation on the givewell page on /charity at Nov 5, 2022, 3:11:29 PM PDT. (This is the donation made after Mr. Stone incorrectly resolved /stone/will-there-be-a-report-button-withi)
Resolves to YES iff we donate the full amount. Resolves to NO if, like, we reverse the txn or nullify it by adding txns that transfer the donated amount to manifold or to users.
Close date updated to 2022-12-31 11:59 pm
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ58 | |
| 2 | Ṁ37 | |
| 3 | Ṁ27 | |
| 4 | Ṁ16 | |
| 5 | Ṁ10 |
People are also trading
@IsaacKing yeah we took no action which means it was dispersed when the rest of the q4 donations were
@Sinclair If you're making traders square for misresolutions, you should do this one too. It was also a relativly large market, and it didn't even have the noble goal of donating to charity; Alex just wanted to steal other people's mana for personal use.
And Alex still doesn't even have a warning badge next to their name, despite the number of people who have reported their market.
In standup today, I proposed we don't N/A that market, but still take the donation from givewell and put it in @ManifoldMarkets. Everyone else thought this was a hilariously terrible idea ("it's reverse robinhood!") but I stand by it.
very easy to implement
justly nullifies Mr Stone's winnings
if Mr Stone did the right thing, givewell wouldn't get that money, therefore in some sense it isn't justly theirs
if made a precedent/policy, it's sufficient to stop sober and calculating users from engaging in similar fraud
would givewell even want the winnings? it's probably too small for them to care, but nonprofits typically reject funding that comes from crime, due to reputation and legal risk
