Will Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost M1 mission successfully land on the moon?

1kṀ1715

Mar 2

70%

chance

ALL

Firefly is a private spaceflight company. The Blue Ghost lander has been contracted by NASA under the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program to build and fly a lander to the surface of the moon. It should launch in 2024.

For a successful mission the Blue Ghost lander needs to soft-land on the moon, and the payloads on the lander need to be operational.

Blue Ghost M1 will be followed by Blue Ghost M2.

Space

Space exploration

Commercial spaceflight

Moon

Moon landers

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

Will Astrobotic Technology's Griffin Mission 1 mission successfully land on the moon?

74% chance

Will Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost M2 mission successfully land on the moon?

92% chance

Will ispace's Hakuto-R M2 mission successfully land on the moon?

68% chance

Will Blue Origin's first Blue Moon HLS mission successfully land on the moon?

66% chance

Will Astrobotic's Astrobotic Mission 3 mission successfully land on the moon?

55% chance

Will Astrobotic's Griffin Lander land (mostly successfully) on the moon?

58% chance

Will Blue Origin land on the moon before July 4th, 2025?

3% chance

Will ispace's SERIES 2 mission successfully land on the moon?

56% chance

Will SpaceX's HLS lander successfully land on the moon on the first attempt?

70% chance

Will Blue Origin land an uncrewed Blue Moon MK1 lander on the moon before SpaceX lands an uncrewed Starship?

Sort by:

https://apnews.com/article/nasa-firefly-aerospace-blue-ghost-moon-landing-07b00840da07441e1e24b48509458f3f

bought Ṁ100 NO

If the lander soft-lands on the Moon and functions normally, but one or more of the payloads are not operational because they have their own failures unrelated to the landing, how does this resolve?

@sesquipedalianThaumaturge you can see this market for the IM1 lander, that was resolved by person that made this market, and how it went, but in general as stated in this market, I think it shouldn't affect the resolution, as this is about the landing.

@ScipioFabius The resolution criterion for that market was that the lander "needs to soft-land on the moon such that the landing does not interfere with the function of the payloads", but for this one it's that the lander "needs to soft-land on the moon, and the payloads on the lander need to be operational." This seems importantly different, which is why I'm not sure if it's meant to be the same.