Resolves YES if it is positive coverage, NO if it is negative coverage, 50% if it is scrupulously neutral. Resolves N/A if the New York Times dies.
The primary topic of the article must be Manifold Markets.
Please post NY Times articles in the comments if you think they should resolve this market.
I will not trade on this market.
Close date updated to 2023-07-01 6:59 pm
As the arbiter of conventional morality and taboo, nyt would probably focus on irreverent markets about moral topics and use that to portray the site as a hive of villainy. Not providing links to them.
@StrayClimb Or scaldal markets as EA’s solution to future SBFs!
@GarrettBaker Actually, wait, they’ve been fairly positive to sbf so maybe not
@GarrettBaker SBF was useful idiot supporting democrats so of course NYT thought he was some sort of secular Jesus.
New Woke Times is in love with itself and its perspective, so I would think they will be hostile to just people on the internet gamifying prediction. The tone will be one of: stay in your lane with an entire graph or two denouncing assassination markets.
@AlQuinn basically my take except I think it's more generic elitism, not a woke thing. We'll see if we're right.
What if it’s arguably net positive but includes a lot of scathing criticism over certain issues?
@LarsDoucet based on my subjective judgement possibility using a sentiment analysis tool.
Data point: I believe this is the first NYT article about Kalshi: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/04/business/election-prediction-markets-midterms.html. It looks positive overall.
Related markets
Related markets
The first piece about Manifold Markets in New York Times will be positive, 8k, beautiful, illustration, trending on art station, picture of the day, epic composition