
This question resolves to the TIME 2025 Person of The Year. It uses consolidated answers to avoid having to predict who the major party nominees will be, or the exact wording of any abstract/group answers.
If you would like to add a new candidate or consolidated answer to the market, submit them in a comment below. If a comment gets enough support, I'll open the market to submissions so that you can add it and you'll get the unique trader bonuses.
Note that all consolidated answers must be mutually exclusive, so no more specific or general versions of existing options. The goal is to cleanly divide the probabilistic landscape into non-overlapping categories.
If multiple options do end up being true, then those options will resolve to an even split of 100%.
People are also trading
@TiredCliche "You don't actually understand, in two years the chips will understand how to play chess, they'll drive your car and code fairy chess websites for you!!"
Yeah whatever I've heard all that before
@TiredCliche "oh in 2027 the ai will learn how to eat pussy!" Great, then maybe your mom will stop calling me every Tuesday night. Another 2000 against Jensen.
@Yakushi12345 Personally I think very many of these are undervalued. I have YES holdings on ten, I think
Meta: it’s wild the extent to which prediction markets have been silently become mainstream over the last 18 months.

@spider to what extent is that based on your history/cookies etc? When I do the same search I don't get any mention of prediction markets
@Fion no clue if google is doing anything with location / IP / device hash, but I reliably see this in an incognito window without any cookies or history
I've found that Manifold has a pretty consistent bias towards all things AI and betting against that tends to be profitable. I highly doubt "Person of the Year" would be given to a non-person. Given that Francis won Time POTY the year he was elected Pope and we now have the first American Pope, 18% for Leo XIV seems way too low. Imo Leo should be the highest option, followed by Jensen Huang and then Mamdani
@SentientTree Manifold AI bias, yes, but also don’t forget:
https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19830103,00.html
@JimHays that was very much hype too. We were all going to use computers to store our cooking recipes...
@SentientTree I agree with most of your points, but you should know that Time usually doesn't pick a pope just for being elected. The only time that happened was in 2013, when Pope Francis won it. But that was a special year, because
a) it was the first time in 600 years that a pope had resigned, and
b) Benedict was one of the most conservative popes in contemporary history, and Francis was one of the most progressive, which made for a dramatic shift.
The only special thing about Pope Leo is that he's the first American pope. But do people really care about that? Probably not. I do consider him to be the frontrunner, though, because there aren't any strong candidates this year. I give him a 20% chance.
@Bayesian Sorry I don't know anything about Time Magazine, all I know is Manifold is full of people who are convinced "AI" is something regular average people think about as more than a sideshow.
@Eliza All sorts of places are full of people who are wrong, let us not be defined by the wrongest of us but rather by our market prices. Any market you think is very wrong? I’m happy to provide liquidity
@SentientTree i'd definitely bet more on shorter term markets because 10+ year markets are not very meaningful considering the interest rate, but presumably you wanna bet no, I'll offer plenty of YES at 43% if you want (ah nvm, the market is in fact very liquid, is your issue that the market isn't updating to your view then? that's the benefit of shorter term markets, they do do that pretty fast if you're right)