Who will be TIME Magazine's 2025 Person of the Year?
1.7k
50kṀ1.9m
Dec 11
35%
Artificial Intelligence (Including ChatGPT or any other variation)
16%
Jensen Huang
16%
Pope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost)
11%
Other
6%
Donald Trump and/or JD Vance
5%
Zohran Mamdani
2%
Sam Altman
1%
Benjamin Netanyahu
1%
Gen Z

This question resolves to the TIME 2025 Person of The Year. It uses consolidated answers to avoid having to predict who the major party nominees will be, or the exact wording of any abstract/group answers.

If you would like to add a new candidate or consolidated answer to the market, submit them in a comment below. If a comment gets enough support, I'll open the market to submissions so that you can add it and you'll get the unique trader bonuses.

Note that all consolidated answers must be mutually exclusive, so no more specific or general versions of existing options. The goal is to cleanly divide the probabilistic landscape into non-overlapping categories.

If multiple options do end up being true, then those options will resolve to an even split of 100%.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

100 mana to the first person to give a convincing reason for why AI is spiking

But that just replaces one question with another.

@ItsMe the market mechanism aggregated whatever public or private info existed

My friend is hooking up with the girl that runs the social media accounts for Salesforce and he says she already has the connect on who it will be already. No surprise here.

Do you know who it is?

bought Ṁ100 YES

Buying some pope now more people are accusing him of being the antichrist.

@MartinRandall it'd be bigger news if a pope wasn't being accused of being the antichrist

bought Ṁ300 YES

yeah yeah i get the precedent and all but trump at 5% really does feel low, he is unquestionably The Main Character on a level that i think he wasn't even in his first term

bought Ṁ20 NO

2500M against Huang at 18%. Y'all gotta be tripping. You can't actually believe that Time is going to choose this no-name as person of the year. He sold a bunch of computer chips. So the hell what

bought Ṁ24 YES

@TiredCliche "You don't actually understand, in two years the chips will understand how to play chess, they'll drive your car and code fairy chess websites for you!!"

Yeah whatever I've heard all that before

opened a Ṁ2,000 NO at 20% order

@TiredCliche "oh in 2027 the ai will learn how to eat pussy!" Great, then maybe your mom will stop calling me every Tuesday night. Another 2000 against Jensen.

How far in advance will the winner leak? Where do I bet on that? I tried searching but couldn't find it.

@Eliza on it

bought Ṁ2 YES

Putin at .1 is undervalued, I put a little on him.

@Yakushi12345 Personally I think very many of these are undervalued. I have YES holdings on ten, I think

@JussiVilleHeiskanen I have yes holdings on like every option

@bens Including OTHER? I'll be so pissed off if this resolves Other.

Meta: it’s wild the extent to which prediction markets have been silently become mainstream over the last 18 months.

opened a Ṁ50 YES at 16% order

@spider to what extent is that based on your history/cookies etc? When I do the same search I don't get any mention of prediction markets

@Fion no clue if google is doing anything with location / IP / device hash, but I reliably see this in an incognito window without any cookies or history

Might as well get next year's market up now:

bought Ṁ300 YES

I've found that Manifold has a pretty consistent bias towards all things AI and betting against that tends to be profitable. I highly doubt "Person of the Year" would be given to a non-person. Given that Francis won Time POTY the year he was elected Pope and we now have the first American Pope, 18% for Leo XIV seems way too low. Imo Leo should be the highest option, followed by Jensen Huang and then Mamdani

@JimHays that was very much hype too. We were all going to use computers to store our cooking recipes...

@SentientTree I would join you in fleecing this, but I am waay overexposed

@SentientTree I agree with most of your points, but you should know that Time usually doesn't pick a pope just for being elected. The only time that happened was in 2013, when Pope Francis won it. But that was a special year, because

a) it was the first time in 600 years that a pope had resigned, and

b) Benedict was one of the most conservative popes in contemporary history, and Francis was one of the most progressive, which made for a dramatic shift.

The only special thing about Pope Leo is that he's the first American pope. But do people really care about that? Probably not. I do consider him to be the frontrunner, though, because there aren't any strong candidates this year. I give him a 20% chance.

@ItsMe manifold is delusional about AI.

manifold has somewhat closely tracked some pretty liquid real money prediction markets about time POTY, this is giga cope. @ me if you wanna bet against ai happenings tho!

@Bayesian Sorry I don't know anything about Time Magazine, all I know is Manifold is full of people who are convinced "AI" is something regular average people think about as more than a sideshow.

@Eliza All sorts of places are full of people who are wrong, let us not be defined by the wrongest of us but rather by our market prices. Any market you think is very wrong? I’m happy to provide liquidity

@Bayesian Talk is cheap.

@ItsMe TIME is an American-centric publication though. Being the first American Pope is a big deal.

@SentientTree i'd definitely bet more on shorter term markets because 10+ year markets are not very meaningful considering the interest rate, but presumably you wanna bet no, I'll offer plenty of YES at 43% if you want (ah nvm, the market is in fact very liquid, is your issue that the market isn't updating to your view then? that's the benefit of shorter term markets, they do do that pretty fast if you're right)

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy