Will the "Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2030?" market reach 10% in 2023?
101
resolved Sep 6
Resolved
YES

Will Catnee's dominance of AI risk last? Will this market get any traders besides me? Will this blatent attempt to make short term profits work? Tune in next time on Manifold Markets!

The Market in question:

If the displayed value of the above market ever reaches 10% before market close and after the creation of this market, then this market resolves YES. If otherwise, this market resolves NO

Get Ṁ500 play money

Related questions

Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2100
JamesDillard avatarJames Dillard
18% chance
Will AI wipe out humans before end of 2023? (read desc.)
Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2030?
Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2040?
Tripping avatarTripping
15% chance
Will AI wipe out humanity by 2030? [resolves N/A in 2027]
Will AI wipe out humans by 2025? (read desc.)
Will AI wipe out humanity before the Q4 2023?
TeddyWeverka avatarTeddy Weverka
0% chance
Will misaligned AI kill >50% of humanity before 2040?
ahalekelly avatarAdrian
15% chance
Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2026?
TeddyWeverka avatarTeddy Weverka
3% chance
Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2060?
JamesBills avatarJames Bills
15% chance
Will AI wipe out Jimmy Carter before the year 2024?
Mirek avatarQuantum Gambler
51% chance
Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2150?
Will at least three "Will AI wipe out humanity" markets targeting timelines under 100 years be above 50%?
Duncn avatarDuncn
42% chance
Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2200?
Will a sentient AI system have existed before 2030? [Resolves to 2100 expert consensus]
Lovre avatarLovre
36% chance
Will an AI related disaster kill a million people or cause $1T of damage before 2100?
NathanpmYoung avatarNathan Young
46% chance
IF artificial superintelligence exists by 2030, will AI wipe out humanity by 2030? [resolves N/A in 2027]
aashiq avataraashiq
29% chance
If AI wipes out humanity by 2030, will Manifold Markets be operational?
aashiq avataraashiq
46% chance
Contingent on AI being perceived as a threat, will humans deliberately cause an AI winter before 2030?
LarsDoucet avatarLars Doucet
39% chance
Will misaligned AI kill >50% of humanity before 2050?
ahalekelly avatarAdrian
26% chance

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ2,122
2Ṁ572
3Ṁ535
4Ṁ365
5Ṁ295
Sort by:
alextes avatar
Alexpredicted YES

Great market 🤑. Will be looking to create my own like it!

This can be the first 😬

https://manifold.markets/EliezerYudkowsky/will-artificial-superintelligence-e

KevinLobLaw avatar
Kevin Blaw

Do we have faith that AI will resolve this correctly after our demise? Is there a chance AI resolves this market prematurely to hasten our demise?

deagol avatar
Daniel Tellopredicted YES

Resolves YES

MichaelWheatley avatar
Michael Wheatleybought Ṁ15,000 of YES

We're ignoring invisible numbers after the decimal, right?

firstuserhere avatar
firstuserherebought Ṁ610 of YES

@deagol I just took the 11% limit order guy's limit orders in another market and now his balance must be less than 6k. So some those 11% limit orders are going to be cancelled atm

(His balance currently shows 12k but should update in a few minutes)

6 replies
deagol avatar
Daniel Tellobought Ṁ0 of NO

@firstuserhere 73612 wall break rn

evergreenemily avatar
evergreenpredicted YES

@deagol Now down to 65,799.

LukeHanks avatar
Luke Hankspredicted YES

@evergreenemily 51,524 now.

LukeHanks avatar
Luke Hankspredicted YES

@LukeHanks 46,232 now.

deagol avatar
Daniel Tellobought Ṁ462 of YES

@LukeHanks 13,482

evergreenemily avatar
evergreenpredicted YES

@deagol holy hell

alextes avatar
Alexbought Ṁ11 of YES

We've started eating the 11% wall on the linked market 👀.

MartinRandall avatar
Martin Randallbought Ṁ10 of NO

Everyone's mana is tied up in floaty rock markets.

alextes avatar
Alexbought Ṁ100 of YES

Does anyone have insight on what @Jelle is doing here? They are most of the NO here and also are most of the wall at 11% (42k) that this market refers to.

6 replies
jskf avatar
jskfpredicted YES

Seems fairly clear then? They're one of the people who for questionable reasons try to bid up the AI doom markets, and they have enough faith in their limit orders to bet NO here.

alextes avatar
Alexpredicted YES

@jskf What are these questionable reasons? I mean I’m literally “questioning the reasons” 😅. I would understand having a higher personal p(doom) but I’m not sure why you’d also bet the rest of the p(doom) market will agree with you, especially when you are personally most of the reason that market isn’t already at 10%. So maybe I’m missing something here.

jskf avatar
jskfpredicted YES

Oh, since you were asking here I thought your question was mostly about the bet here. I think some of the possible questionable reasons for betting up doom markets are:

  1. A belief that "betting your true beliefs" is honorable.

  2. Failing to understand that if you're right you don't actually win. This one seems very unlikely, though.

  3. Trolling people who expect doom markets will go down because the incentives point in that direction. "The market can stay irrational longer than you can remain active on Manifold" (or at least longer than you're willing to lock up your mana).

  4. Expectation that people like Catnee will bet the market up even further.

  5. Hope that if the market is high, people will take AI risk more seriously (lmao).

deagol avatar
Daniel Tellosold Ṁ14 of NO

@jskf @alextes not sure if that analysis holds given @Jelle is actually holding pretty significant NO positions in many AI doom markets, including 3.7k in the 2030 one, at a cost of 21%. Also, their balance can’t cover those 11% limits. I suspect the bet here was a miscalculation or hedge gone bad.

MartinRandall avatar
Martin Randallpredicted NO

@alextes While the linked market was at ~20% there was an arbitrage of buying NO on the linked market, setting a limit YES order at 11% on the linked market, and betting NO here. Then you win on the linked market if it goes to 10% and you win here if it doesn't. It's pretty easy to miscalculate such bets, but they can work.

alextes avatar
Alexpredicted YES

@MartinRandall that makes sense, thanks.

JonathanRay avatar
Jonathan Ray

It’s quite underpriced now relative to the N/A one

JosephNoonan avatar
Plasma Ballin'bought Ṁ10 of YES

Who wants to go bet Ṁ264597 on NO?

1 reply
DylanSlagh avatar
Dylan Slaghpredicted YES
evergreenemily avatar
evergreenbought Ṁ30 of YES

Down to 12% now!

CertaintyOfVictory avatar
Certainty of Victorybought Ṁ1 of YES

@DylanSlagh What do you mean with "reaches 10%"? From the top or from the bottom? Or exactly 10%?

1 reply
DylanSlagh avatar
Dylan Slaghpredicted NO

@CertaintyOfVictory If the displayed value of that market is ever at or below 10% after the creation of this market, this market resolves YES