If the linked market resolves NO, this one will also resolve NO. However, if it resolves YES, after Levi(na) provides their evidence, I will conduct a 12-hour poll on the Manifold Discord asking whether people feel Levi(na) went on a date with a cute nerdy guy, with options YES and NO. I will then resolve to the percentage of YES responses in that poll, ignoring any suspected manipulation.
I'm excited to see Levina's evidence for resolving YES!
General policy for my markets: In the rare event of a conflict between my resolution criteria and the agreed-upon common-sense spirit of the market, I may resolve it according to the market's spirit or N/A, probably after discussion.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ113 | |
| 2 | Ṁ64 | |
| 3 | Ṁ62 | |
| 4 | Ṁ61 | |
| 5 | Ṁ54 |
@Conflux your criteria says to avoid manipulation, I think we can assume most of the bettors are at least somewhat biased and hence their votes are a form of manipulation.
@levifinkelstein I’m not that interested in making this complicated. If you have strong evidence that someone voted against their own belief or something else, I’ll consider it. However, I think the votes are consistent with your evidence just not being very strong.
I don't think we'll get any evidence either way, but the original market 'should' resolve YES if the other party genuinely thought it was a date / if they met on a dating app, and NO if the other party was a friend who he had lunch with, even if levi joked that 'haha this month's lunch will be a DATE because i want to win some internet points'
@jacksonpolack What if I have a friend and I ask them "do you want to on a date with me" and they say "Yes, where do you want to go?" 😃 And then we go to a restaurant like people do on dates?
@hmys why would someone make a personal market if they aren't going to share personal details?
@Stralor Idk what you mean by "personal market", but my intention in creating this market was definitely not to dox myself. So if that's what you mean by "personal market" this is not one of those.
@levifinkelstein The original point stands. Your face and the face of the person in question is not information that can dox you, if you don’t want those shared you should not have created this market
I have seen no evidence that this person was cute, nor nerdy, nor even a guy. Just a photo of Levi eating with someone. But that's already more proof than @Hyperpolitan was willing to fabricate, I'll give him that.
I'm glad Levi got outside and ate a meal. I'm sad that he keeps making those dumb trick-markets. I currently intend to vote NO in the poll.
@Stralor I need to stop betting on his markets, he capriciously resolves against people all the time purely for profit
@Conflux so nice to be pansexual, honestly. For me It would've been much easier to take a photo kissing someone nerdy on their cheek, regardless of their gender.
Oh well. Not making markets like that any time soon anyways.
@Conflux I really was, we established multiple times it would probably not be, and people keep betting in Levi's markets. STOP BETTING IN LEVI'S MARKETS IF YOU KNOW THEY AREN'T LEGIT
@levifinkelstein Do you have more evidence you want to provide, or should I conduct the poll now?
@Conflux Will the onlyfans video be included if it's behind a paywall? seems unreasonable
@Conflux You can conduct the poll now, the video might take a while given that I'm currently out travelling and don't feel like doing a bunch of editing rn.
@Conflux if the poll determines this market to resolve NO, but later a definitive proof is posted that confirms the date, will you ask for the market to be re-resolved?
@firstuserhere I wanna wait before conducting the poll until Levi states they’ve released all evidence they plan to release. I don’t plan to get the market re-resolved after that point
@Conflux Levi said to run the poll! I've already bet accordingly with the assumption that the (definitely real video) will not be available for this poll 😭
@Gen I'm not waiting for Levi's permission to run the poll, I'm waiting for them to state they've released all evidence.
@Conflux (obviously if this takes a really long time, such that it seems likely that the video will never be released, I'll just do the poll, but I'll wait a bit for now)