Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
Who is Nate Silver subtweeting when he implies someone on Twitter/X was revealed to be totally crazy?
9
Ṁ470Ṁ367
resolved Nov 15
59%59%Other
25%25%
[Not actually about anyone specific]
5%5%
Elon Musk
5%5%
Ben Shapiro
4%4%
Max Blumenthal
2%1.9%
Dave Wasserman

Resolves based on the consensus view on November 14th. If that means resolving to different options at different probabilities, that's fine. I may resolve earlier if it's clear earlier.

(I added some people mentioned in the replies, but could be anyone.)

I won't bet after my initial setting of probabilities.

General policy for my markets: In the rare event of a conflict between my resolution criteria and the agreed-upon common-sense spirit of the market, I may resolve it according to the market's spirit or N/A, probably after discussion.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ34
2Ṁ1
3Ṁ1
4Ṁ1
5Ṁ1
Sort by:

Still no clarifications about who this is about, so I’m just gonna resolve PROB since the market seemed reasonable.

I'm pretty sure he'd agree with everything Dave has been arguing with people about so there's no way it's him

also, i think nate probably has a fairly high bar for a tweet like this, not just "disagreeing with people about electoral probabilities"