We were initially planning to use the Proof in Person market — indeed, a printed draft version of the yearbook included a screenshot of that graph — but as the AP calc day sent it into N/A tumult, its status has been put into doubt with the yearbook deadline fast approaching. We've been unable to think of any Proofnik markets whose graphs would be an ideal fit for the yearbook: representative of the fun and utility that Manifold has brought Proof, graph tells a good story, and will be approved by faculty. But maybe you can think of one, or persuade @enaz and I!
Resolves to the link to the market whose graph gets used.
If multiple graphs are used, resolves to all the correct answers in equal proportion.
Resolves to "No graph" if no graph is used.
General policy for my markets: In the rare event of a conflict between my resolution criteria and the agreed-upon common-sense spirit of the market, I may resolve it according to the market's spirit or N/A, probably after discussion.
1,000
3.00🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ386 | |
| 2 | Ṁ53 | |
| 3 | Ṁ20 | |
| 4 | Ṁ0 |
@Conflux how much of that decision is influenced by your dislike for the creator of the market? It's the best one that represents a shift in betting after the broken resolution criteria in person one
@KyleWan We printed a test yearbook to see how everything looked, but we can make changes until…May 8, I think?
@Conflux okay! Also, i bought up the half of proof school one not necessarily because i think it will get chosen, I just want to recommend that one!