Whose P(Doom) is higher: Emmett Shear (YES) or Sam Altman (NO)?
16
1kṀ332
2300
86%
chance

Resolves whenever each of Sam Altman and Emmett Shear share their P(doom).

For the purpose of this question:

- If they give a range (like 10%-90%), I'll take the midpoint and consider that their P(doom) for the purpose of this question.
- Resolves when they both publicly share their P(doom) (similar phrasings are allowed).

- Doesn't count instances from before this market was created (but if you're aware of such instances it may inform your predictions)

- For the first person that shares their P(doom), their P(doom) will be the last P(doom) they share publicly before the market resolves. ie if Shear says 30% in 2024, 40% in 2025, and Altman says 35% in 2026, this resolves YES, meaning Shear's P(doom) is deemed higher.

Related market:

AI
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

People are also trading

Will Eliezer Yudkowsky publicly claim to have a P(doom) of less than 97% at any point before 2028?
10% chance
P(Doom) - Emmett Shear
Will Alex Zhu meaningfully affect p(doom) by more than 2%?
18% chance
Will davidad meaningfully affect p(doom) by more than 3%?
6% chance
Will agent foundations [eg Scott Garrabrant] end up affecting p(doom) more than 5%?
55% chance
P(Doom) - Dario Amodei
Valid argument for high p(doom) in @EliezerYudkowsky's upcoming book "If Anyone Builds, Everyone Dies"?
34% chance
Will the next president state a P(doom)?
Will manifold markets meaningfully affect p(doom) by more than 3%?
18% chance
Eliezer Yudkowsky p(Doom) stock
93
© Manifold Markets, Inc.•Terms•Privacy