If the conclusion follows from the premises presented in the book, and this fact is well-indicated by the arguments in the book this market resolves YES. Otherwise, this market resolves NO.
Resolution will be based on the objective judgement of @jim
Update 2025-06-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): In response to a question about their personal views, the creator has stated that they do not believe Eliezer Yudkowsky has ever articulated a valid argument for high p(doom) in the past. This provides context for the creator's starting position before reading the book.
Update 2025-06-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has clarified that the term "objective judgement" used in the resolution criteria is tongue-in-cheek.
People are also trading
@ProjectVictory Like, I think Yudkowsky actually agrees with me, but plausibly that's what this book sets out to solve? Not sure.
