https://twitter.com/SBF_FTX/status/1601186246990401537?cxt=HHwWgsDU8Y-ax7gsAAAA
Resolve to Yes if SBF testified (in person or remotely) at the House hearing on Dec 13th.
Resolve to No if SBF didn't testify on Dec 13th. Resolve to No if SBF testified on another date
Close date updated to 2022-12-14 1:00 am
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ469 | |
| 2 | Ṁ250 | |
| 3 | Ṁ126 | |
| 4 | Ṁ105 | |
| 5 | Ṁ105 |
@BTE Doesnt count if he only submitted his statement but didnt speak
I'm waiting until end of today to resolve the market
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenehrlich/2022/12/13/exclusive-transcript-the-full-testimony-sbf-planned-to-give-to-congress/?sh=5cdf0e8b3c47 isn't definitive, but does include a transcript of his (previously) intended testimony.
@EdwardKmett cool to see you on here. I have seen you speak at LambdaJam a while back and like your Haskell libraries.
@Undox Thanks! I've been using this to try to keep myself a bit better balanced about what is going on in the "real" world. I find spending a half-hour predicting and adjusting predictions works way better than spending an hour reading the news and makes my internal state update much more accurately to the real state of the world by making me feel when I was wrong with something other than just hindsight bias.
@AmmonLam YES!! If II was his lawyer I would ask for him to not be granted bail just to keep him from ever being able to talk again, but no chance he gets released before he is extradited and arraigned which will not happen before this hearing.
@AmmonLam The SDNY has already announced they won't even unseal the indictment until tomorrow