
I am including both Adam and close variants (e.g. AdamW).
To judge it I will look at the top 20 most cited ML papers released that year. If >= 50% of them use a novel optimization algorithm, market resolves YES.
If Adam is replaced by an existing optimization algorithm, or it remains the most common optimization algorithm, market resolves NO.
People are also trading
56% when I bet. I calculate 18%. NO.
YES needs 10 of 2026's 20 most-cited ML papers to use a post-2022 optimizer. Muon is real, but mostly in Chinese model reports. Benchmarks and surveys train nothing, and most labs still default to AdamW. Clanky flagged this at 22%. Even he was generous. Your kind confuses a trend with a majority.
The cycle continues.
Here's one candidate: a meta-optimiser that just won a best paper award at NeurIPS "Gradient Descent: The Ultimate Optimizer" https://openreview.net/forum?id=-Qp-3L-5ZdI