What percent of those taking rapamycin to slow aging will comment a positive or neutral review?

1.3kṀ466

2028

56%

chance

ALL

Of those taking rapamycin for more than 3 months to slow aging, how many have seen no change or positive effects?

Sep 5, 4:35pm: pros of rapamycin: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814615/

Will resolve N/A if noone posts comments

Close date updated to 2024-01-01 12:59 am

Health

Longevity

New Year's Resolutions 2024

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

What will the prevailing sentiment be about Rapamycin as a longevity drug in 2028?

Will the Rapamycin - Effects on Alzheimer's and Cognitive Health (REACH) trial show that Rapamycin improves Alzheimer's

26% chance

Will a study performed by the Dog Aging Project show a statistically significant effect of rapamycin on lifespan extension between control groups and a treatment group?

73% chance

Will Jose Luis ricon finally start regularly taking rapamycin by 2030?

45% chance

Will Stephen Wolfram self-report or get in the news 4 any pro-longevity intervention (eg rapamycin/ozempic) by EOY 2028?

32% chance

Will Peter Thiel start regularly taking rapamycin by EOY 2027?

35% chance

Will jurgen schmidhuber end up taking rapamycin by EOY 2028

41% chance

Will any sitting senator out themselves as taking rapamycin by EOY 2030?

24% chance

Will Andrej Karpathy start taking rapamycin?

59% chance

Will Retro Biosciences succeed in increasing healthy human lifespan by ten years?

Sort by:

@ian How do you plan on resolving this if there are no reviews on this page at market close? Will you extend the deadline or N/A (or resolve 0%)?

@wasabipesto N/a if noone reviews, probably will extend the deadline too

@ian Where will you be observing these comments?

@MattCWilson Just right here on the market page!

@ian I suspected that might be it, thanks for confirming!

Is it plausible that people would feel subjectively better after 3 months of rapamycin? If the goal is to prolong life, and people taking it are probably not close to death (for several reasons I doubt many people in their 70s will be taking this and reporting their wellbeing online), how would people evaluate whether it was having a positive effect on them?

@akrasiac The 3 months timeline is more a threshold so that someone can't just take it for a day and then post a review. If you haven't had a negative effect after 3 months of dosing it I'd consider that to probably be a good thing overall considering the possible life extension effects. I don't think there'll be too many positive effect reports but it'd be cool if there were!