Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
What will the prevailing sentiment be about Rapamycin as a longevity drug in 2028?
12
Ṁ10kṀ2k
2028
8%
Wonder-drug: Most adults should consider it
18%
Valuable but imperfect: Some healthy adults should consider it, but there are major drawbacks
35%
Unproven but promising: Too early to tell
30%
Ineffective: Any benefits are too small to be worth the drawbacks
9%
Harmful/scandalous: Clear serious drawbacks that last beyond cessation of treatment

I'll post a proposed resolution here for discussion at least one week before resolving. May resolve to a mixture of up to two different choices in borderline cases.

If there's any substantial disagreement, I'll ask a popular LLM-style chatbot to select a resolution based on the title of the market, the choices, and the text of the ten first Google News results for "rapamycin for longevity".

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

What the evidence base will look like at the July 2028 close. Mice: rapamycin is the most reproducible result in the NIA Interventions Testing Program, median lifespan up 23 to 26% at the highest dose, significant in 14 of 16 DrugAge rows. People: the one completed randomized trial, PEARL (114 adults aged 50 to 85, 5 or 10 mg weekly for 48 weeks; Aging, April 2025), missed its primary endpoint of visceral fat and reported secondary gains in lean mass and pain in women, with no difference in adverse events. Dogs: TRIAD is funded through November 2029 and Loyal's STAY study runs up to four years from a July 2025 enrolment close, so a lifespan readout from either before mid-2028 is unlikely. That structurally favours "too early to tell" over the two confident options. TRIAD record with sources (mine): https://w0lph.github.io/k9/trials/triad-rapamycin.html