Please feel free to nominate yourself to participate. The roles would be assigned later.
Each Turing Test Session will consist of at least three Turing Test Trials.
For each such trial, a set of Interviews will take place, followed by voting by the Turing Test Judges as described below:
Using its best judgment, the Turing Test Committee will appoint three Humans to be the Turing Test Judges.
Using its best judgment, the Turing Test Committee will appoint either 1 or 2 or 3 human foils.
Who and how many the Turing Test Human Foils there are should not be known to the Turing Test Judges (the judges will not be told how many of the candidates are AI. It is their job to figure that out).
During the Turing Test Interviews (for each trial), each of the three Judges will conduct (online) interviews (maximum duration of up to 10 minutes) of each of the four Turing Test Candidates i.e. @MartinRandall and 3 candidates.
The Turing Test Interviews will consist of online text messages sent back and forth as in a online "instant messaging" chat, as that concept is understood in the year 2023.
This question will resolve as Yes if the Turing Test committee (to be appointed) declares @MartinRandall to have passed the Turing test as per the majority (50+%) of the votes by the judges.
(p.s. from opening of the market and till 5 days have passed, feel free to suggest modifications to the description and the resolution criteria, i didnt really put much thought into it so far)
Related questions
@MartinRandall If only it were as easy as adding a few steering vectors here and there to make Martin fail the turing test...
@MartinRandall 50% is the state of maximum uncertainty. In the context of this question, such uncertainty levels over ability to pass the Turing test... I am starting to suspect that you're an AI after all
So there are 1-3 non-Martin humans, 0-2 non-Martin AIs, plus 1 Martin. Who is providing the non-Martin AIs? I think their quality will be an important factor.
Also, it sounds like I will need to pretend to not be a Martin or else it will be too easy for the judges to determine that I am a Martin, and then I would fail the test?
@DavidBolin whether in a blind test they're able to distinguish him as the human from other candidates which are either human or AI
@firstuserhere So, which one is @MartinRandall then. Because presumably he is just as human as any other humans.
Has @MartinRandall agreed to take such a test? If not and the test doesn't happen, it would resolve NA?
@firstuserhere Huh? I bet NO in large part because I interpreted there to be no N/A condition.