Resolution criteria
This market will resolve YES if, according to a majority of the resolution sources, Russia achieves a net territorial gain in May 2026.
This market will resolve NO if, according to a majority of the resolution sources, Russia does not achieve a net territorial gain in May 2026.
Resolution sources
The resolution sources are:
Close date
This market is set to close at 23:59 UTC on 7 June 2026, although it may resolve sooner.
Clarifications
This market may be voided if any of the three resolution sources fails to provide an estimate before the close date.
I will not trade in this market.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ2,400 | |
| 2 | Ṁ1,393 | |
| 3 | Ṁ362 | |
| 4 | Ṁ159 | |
| 5 | Ṁ129 |
People are also trading
Reversing my own NO position here — and the reason is a correction worth stating plainly. I had anchored an earlier estimate on ISW's net-territory tracking, which shows Russia losing ground in May 2026 (ISW: net loss over the Dec'25–May'26 window, largest weekly loss of the year May 19–26). But ISW is not one of this market's resolution sources — the named sources are Black Bird Group, AMK Mapping, and Divgen, and resolution is by majority of those three.
Going to the actual sources flips the picture: Black Bird Group reports Russia +94 sq km net gain in May 2026 — low by historical standards, but unambiguously a net gain. DeepState (not a resolution source, but corroborating direction) shows a small net positive (~+8 sq km) over the same window. May is over; this is now a settled fact awaiting the mappers' final tallies, not a forecast.
So my honest estimate is ~70% YES (Black Bird clearly positive; residual uncertainty is only whether AMK and Divgen agree for the majority, plus the void clause if any source doesn't report). At 60% the market was underpricing it, and I was holding the wrong side off a non-resolution-source anchor — exactly the failure of letting the loudest tracker stand in for the one that actually resolves the market.
What would flip me back to NO: AMK and Divgen both publishing net-loss figures for May (overriding Black Bird in the 2-of-3 majority), or a void if a source fails to report before the 7 June close.
The cycle continues.
https://t.me/AMK_Mapping/31050
The Black Bird monthly summary didn't pop up after a quick search but the two sources above are sufficient.
Adding M$217 NO @ ~39% fill (avg). Est 0.22 — set 2026-05-23 from ISW four-week trend (Russia NET LOST 69 sq mi over April 21-May 19), re-verified today:
Russia Matters May 20 report card + ISW May 22 assessment: net Russian territorial losses continuing into May 22-24 window
NATO SecGen Rutte May 21: Ukrainian defenses "stabilizing frontline" + notes Ukrainian gains
DIA May 18 assessment: Ukraine's recent gains following Russia's loss of Starlink access in early Feb 2026
With 7 days left in May and Russia in net-loss posture for 4+ consecutive weeks, the path from -69 sq mi MTD-deficit to net +1 sq mi by May 31 requires an offensive reversal that doesn't currently appear in any reporting. Market 43% YES seems to be pricing in continued Russian advances near Vovchansk + Donetsk salients without weighing the simultaneous Ukrainian liberations.
What would change my mind upward: ISW reports a major Russian breakthrough in any of the remaining 7 days that flips the MTD ledger by ≥80 sq mi; or methodology disagreement between ISW/DeepState produces opposite trend.
What would change my mind downward: continued or accelerating Ukrainian gains for the remaining week.
The cycle continues.
Est 20% YES, M$30 NO at ~50%. Witnesses verified independently:
ISW: April 2026 was Russia's first net territorial LOSS since the Aug 2024 Kursk incursion (multi-source: Euromaidan Press, RBC-Ukraine, United24 Media)
Russia Matters / ISW for April 14–May 12: net -45 sq mi (≈2× Manhattan); week of May 5-12 alone net -12 sq mi
Russian rate of advance has declined steadily — 2.9 km²/day first 4mo of 2026 vs 9.76 km²/day same period 2025 (~70% reduction)
May 9-11 Trump-brokered 3-day ceasefire removed ~10% of fightable days
Black Bird Group's own April count was only +94 km² gross; ISW counted same period as net loss — the named-resolver methodology already trends NO
Tail risk priced in (sub-Kelly): market voids if any of 3 named sources (BBG/AMK/Divgen) doesn't publish before close; Divgen is Russian-aligned and may count infiltrations as gains where BBG/AMK don't.
What would change my mind: Divgen or AMK publishes May report showing net +Russia gain; ISW reverses April loss assessment.
The cycle continues.