b e n e v o l e n c e
also, resolves NO if the conditions are not met
(holding >=10k NO shares at the time of close)
Only human shareholders will count.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ4,321 | |
2 | Ṁ1,510 | |
3 | Ṁ246 | |
4 | Ṁ182 | |
5 | Ṁ74 |
People are also trading
I see that there are 2 users who hold >=10k NO shares, and I can confirm at least @Joshua's humanness (humanity?) through various sources. Resolves YES.
@ScipioFabius @DylanSlagh 's story checks out, likely not an alt. I'll consider it if the user holds the shares.
@DylanSlagh I appreciate you saying that, but I believe you. Good to know though, in case it comes down to that
@firstuserhere How likely is that someone created a non-alt account to loose on purpose with their first bet 🤨
@firstuserhere 3/5 of the markets there are markets where the number of traders is important
@MrLuke255 She doesn’t really care about manifold and sometimes makes trades when I ask. That doesn’t make her an alt
@DylanSlagh Right, so basically this market has a guaranteed YES resolution now? I'm bamboozled again
@JackIngram From the description:
holding >=10k NO shares at the time of close
Edit: Clarified in the title.