What will Trump criticize during the presidential campaign? [ADD RESPONSES]
44
3.2kṀ3309
resolved Nov 17
Resolved
YES
Mike Pence
Resolved
YES
Google
Resolved
YES
Joe Biden
Resolved
YES
Kamala Harris
Resolved
YES
The New York Times
Resolved
YES
CNN
Resolved
YES
Jack Smith
Resolved
YES
China
Resolved
YES
California
Resolved
YES
Nancy Pelosi
Resolved
YES
Gavin Newsom
Resolved
YES
Taylor Swift
Resolved
YES
Fox News
Resolved
YES
Facebook/Meta
Resolved
NO
Nikki Haley
Resolved
NO
AI
Resolved
NO
Mitch McConnell
Resolved
NO
Mike Johnson
Resolved
NO
Vladimir Putin
Resolved
NO
Xi Jinping

You are welcome to add your own options. If you are unsure about an option, you can message and check with me.

Rules (will be updated as needed):

  • Ends with US 2024 presidential election (Nov 4th). It will still count even if Trump does not run for president.

  • Since this can be subjective I will not bet.

  • Any medium, but it must be verifiable (not rumours).

  • [Added 14/03] In general I consider anything posted on Trump's official social media as written by him.

  • Each option only counts things that happened after that option was added.

  • For a single person option it must be directed at the specific person

    • It must be clear who is referring to, but it does not have to be their name ("If you get rid of TikTok, Facebook and Zuckerschmuck will double their business." would also resolve Marc Zuckerberg)

  • For group option, he must criticize the entire group unless specified otherwise

    • So for option "Hollywood actors", he must critize Hollywood actors in general, not just one or couple specific actors from Hollywood

  • It must be direct criticism ot the subject. For example “I would have made a different choice [than X]” does not critize directly, just points out that he would do something differenly, so that does not count.

  • It must have clear negative sentiment. For example "Because of Joe Biden migration is at record high" does not resolve it YES by itself, because "migration" does not automatically mean something negative. But if we added "and migration slowly destroys America", then it would be YES. Similarly if he said "Because of Joe Biden illegal migration is at record high". Illegal migration is condered bad by almost everyone, so it would resolve YES even without any aditional context.

  • [Added 14/03] I am not gonna count just posting a link to a article (that contains some criticism) without anything else (or retweet/"retruth"). But if he adds something like "I agree with this 100%" or "They are right, read this", I would count it, because he actively shows that he agrees with the content.

  • I reserve right to N/A any options that are problematic, but I will try to avoid it

  • For YES resolution you must post evidence (link). I will probably do quick google search for each option after close to check if we missed anything obvious and then resolve rest to NO.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ311
2Ṁ136
3Ṁ52
4Ṁ48
5Ṁ31
© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy