By 2027 Will Tassilo Neubauer Think There Is a Good Definition or Operationalization of Modularity?
1
12
Ṁ10Ṁ120
2026
55%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Got inspired to post this question by this comment thread:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YsFZF3K9tuzbfrLxo/counting-arguments-provide-no-evidence-for-ai-doom#XDa3bBrALtby5kHqf
Resolves to my judgement. I will provide examples for positive or negative examples of things I consider good definitions or operationalizations later.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
By the end of 2026, will we have transparency into any useful internal pattern within a Large Language Model whose semantics would have been unfamiliar to AI and cognitive science in 2006?
50% chance
Will we have a formalized proof of the Modularity theorem by 2029-05-01?
60% chance
Will Transformer based architectures still be SOTA for language modelling by 2026?
67% chance
Will a unified theory of Quantum Gravity usurp the Standard Model before 2045?
77% chance
Will there be a well accepted formal definition of value alignment for AI by 2030?
25% chance
Will a model costing >$30M be intentionally trained to be more mechanistically interpretable by end of 2027? (see desc)
57% chance
Will a (new) technocratic government emerge by 2050?
54% chance
Will a big transformer LM compose these facts without chain of thought by 2026?
87% chance
Will I think that alignment is no longer "preparadigmatic" by the start of 2026?
28% chance
By 2030, will the Mu2e experiment at Fermilab find signals of physics beyond the Standard Model?
27% chance