"Very famous" = Has at least 5 million followers on Twitter, or they're otherwise famous enough that if they were to create a public Twitter account they would almost certainly get that number with ease.
The claim doesn't have to be made on Twitter. It does need to appear genuine and unironic. They don't need to actually follow through on it, but it does need to clearly be a "decision" and not a "hmm, I wonder if I should do this".
Important life decisions include who to date, where to live, what career to be in, etc.
In the event that this has already happened in the past, I reserve the right to change the market criteria to something in the same vein that's a bit more exclusive, so that the previous event doesn't qualify.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ673 | |
| 2 | Ṁ121 | |
| 3 | Ṁ96 | |
| 4 | Ṁ95 | |
| 5 | Ṁ61 |
People are also trading
@JimHays @traders I'm inclined to resolve No by default; does anyone have any specific citations that would suggest a Yes resolution? If so, please provide a link. I'm inclined to wait 48 hours for evidence, since I don't know of a good way to do thorough research.
Comments on this resolution plan are welcome; not intended to be a binding decision.
This doesn’t meet either the bar of “very famous” or “important decision”, but here is an article about someone outsourcing their decision making to AI:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/11/01/technology/generative-ai-decisions-experiment.html
This meets famous (not sure about “very), but not 2024, and not “life” decision, rather a work decision:
Here’s a life decision, but 2025, and not famous
https://www.the-express.com/sport/motorsport/175687/denny-hamlin-son-baby-jameson/amp