@Wott has, without warning, sent me 16 mana seemingly as a response to this Discord message.
I can't just not follow up on that. I can't leave that on my conscience. That would be shameful of me.
@Wott is the 0th Manifolder in this chain. I am the 1st. The same Manifolder cannot be in the chain more than once.
A new Manifolder is added to the chain when they managram another user with a memo that contains and starts with the phrase "double it and pass it on" (non-case sensitive). I may make good faith exceptions to this memo rule at my descretion.
The managram needs at least double the mana they had received.
Additionally, their managram needs to be made within 48 hours of them receiving their initiating managram to count.
Only the 1st valid managram sent by a user counts. Sending multiple to the same or different users will not count the 2nd attempt and beyond.
Market resolves to how many Manifolders successfully "doubled it and passed it on". Only one market answer will resolve YES. The rest, NO.
Shame upon the Manifolder who breaks the chain. That, or shame may be also be brought upon the Manifolder who sends their managram payload to an inactive or distrustful user.
I cannot trade on this market.
Companion market:
Update 2025-10-01 (PST) (β Market Creator updated and approved AI summary of creator comment): The 48-hour window is down to the second. 48:00:00 after counts. 48:00:01 does not.
1,000π Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | αΉ682 | |
| 2 | αΉ551 | |
| 3 | αΉ326 | |
| 4 | αΉ322 | |
| 5 | αΉ310 |
People are also trading
Well, I had a bit of a roadmap of surprises laid out for the following days of this game, but as any dungeon master probably knows, plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.
Per the rules, there must be shame.
@bens I realize I look incredibly suspicious given that I profited the most on this question π
But I only threw like 100 mana at β1β as a bit
@Orangey Honestly it's probably literally my fault it resolved to 1 LOL, I'm the one who paid BenS to do it
@SimonWestlake It wasn't a coordinated intentional payment, but I 'paid him to do it' by putting NO limit orders at 2% on the "1 person" option