See https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01393.pdf
I will only consider papers published at (non junk) scientific journals or conferences, no pre-prints. I will resolve this positively if I find a paper following Demaines proposal or am pointed to it. Almost following the proposal will also resolve positively.
It took me a minute to work out that the paper in question wasn't satirical. The hovertext thing is clever, I suppose? It still sort of seems like you're eliding the problem and scooping it under the rug of another interface layer instead of addressing it, but I'm not sure it's a huge problem to begin with, so . . . I guess?
@AndrewHartman I was super confused about whether it is satirical or not. If it was published two days earlier (and maybe also by someone less famous than Erik Demaine) I would just say it’s a joke.