Add your own bets.
I will resolve according to publicly available information and my best judgment.
Will be resolved at end of 2025 at the latest.
Update 2025-06-17 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For the answer "Iran successfully bomb an Israeli power plant or offshore platform", the creator has specified:
An oil refinery is not considered a power plant.
The market refers to gas offshore platforms.
Update 2025-06-17 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For the answer 'Iran successfully bomb an Israeli power plant or offshore platform', a power plant must be for civilian use.
Update 2025-06-18 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated they would resolve this market to YES if the Israeli government dissolves for any reason before the market's end date.
Update 2025-06-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding a potential bombing of the Fordow facility, the creator has specified their evidence standard for resolution:
A statement from a single political figure (e.g., Donald Trump) is not sufficient on its own.
The creator requires confirmation that the facility was destroyed before resolving.
Update 2025-06-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For an answer related to a 'successful bombing' of the Fordow facility, a strike will not be considered successful if the centrifuges are not destroyed.
Update 2025-06-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For answers proposed by users, the creator has stated they will resolve the answer based on the proposing user's terms and decision.
Update 2025-06-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding the answer for the Fordow facility bombing:
The creator will wait for a proper damage assessment before resolving this answer.
This assessment period could take weeks or months.
The current IAEA statement is considered insufficient for resolution.
Update 2025-06-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For an answer related to an 'attempt to broker a cease-fire/peace deal', the creator has specified that:
A proposal that is 'merely declarative' is insufficient for a YES resolution.
There must be an 'honest attempt' to 'actually push negotiations'.
Update 2025-06-23 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For the answer 'China attempts to broker a cease-fire/peace deal', the creator has specified the following conditions for a YES resolution:
There must be reports of actual ceasefire negotiations.
The negotiations must include both sides of the conflict.
China must be mediating the negotiations.
Update 2025-06-23 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For the answer 'A fifth generation fighter jet is destroyed', the creator has specified their evidence standard:
A claim from Iran, especially if supported by weak evidence like an AI-generated photo, is considered insufficient.
The creator will look for confirmation from the Israeli Air Force (IAF).
Update 2025-06-25 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For the answer 'Fordow facility successfully bombed', the creator has decided to resolve it to N/A due to what they judged to be unclear resolution criteria.
Update 2025-10-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Creator's own answers: A YES resolution requires the event to occur between the answer's creation time and the market deadline (2025-12-31 23:59 UTC). Events before the answer is added or after the deadline do not count.
Update 2025-12-31 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated they will need help from user BlackCrusade to resolve most of the answers in this market, as most answers were created by that user.
Update 2026-01-11 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator intends to resolve the remaining answers as N/A due to them being either ambiguous, inconclusive, or hard to find answers for. Traders are invited to provide thoughts or suggestions regarding the resolution of any of these answers.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ489 | |
| 2 | Ṁ382 | |
| 3 | Ṁ366 | |
| 4 | Ṁ364 | |
| 5 | Ṁ245 |
People are also trading
@traders I intended to resolve the remaining answers as NA due to them being either ambiguous, inconclusive, or hard to find answers for.
If you have any thoughts or suggestions regarding the resolution of any of them, please post them.
@Lemming major media sources Iraq 2.0 seems like a no. Im sure someone used the phrase at some point but its not been a substantial way the conflict is talked about
@Lemming isn't "Coverage of ICE protests never recovers following the bombing of Iran's nuclear sites" clearly NO?
@traders I have resolved most of the easier ones, but this market have quite a lot of answers. I would appreciate opinions regarding how to resolve the remaining ones.
Here’s what I got.
500+ Iranian civilians killed
There is no authoritative source showing 500+ confirmed civilian deaths attributable directly to the Israel–Iran conflict in 2025.
Official Iranian tallies vary, with Reuters reporting ~935 total Iranian deaths during the June 2025 strikes, including some civilians but with no independent verification of how many were civilians vs military. Independent human rights reporting suggests under 100 civilian deaths in specific documented incidents.
https://hengaw.net/en/reports-and-statistics-1/2025/06/article-9
Because civilian attribution and verified numbers remain unclear, this does not meet the high bar for “500+ Iranian civilians killed.”
A poll indicates US citizen support for involvement … less than 25%
Multiple reputable polls in June/July 2025 show low support for US military involvement:
An Axios-reported Economist/YouGov poll found only 16% support direct US military involvement with 60% opposed.
YouGov reported only 16% think the US military should get involved in the conflict.
A Quinnipiac poll showed 42% support for joining strikes (meaning 58% do not support), depending on question wording.
These indicate at least one qualifying poll below 25% support exists, justifying a YES on the <25% poll market.
Iran launches a cruise missile
I couldn’t find any evidence of non-ballistic missiles.
For markets on:
Russia stationing combat jets in Iran
Russian delivery of S-400 to Iran
UN Security Council ceasefire resolution
Iran exiting the NPT
New UNSC arms embargo
Iran seizing a G7-flagged ship
There are no reputable reports of any of these events having happened in 2025 or by year end that I can find, so they should probably resolve NO.
@BlackCrusade I’m inclined to resolve this as NA. According to the HRNA there are 436 civilian deaths + 319 “unknown” deaths.
@BlackCrusade most of the answers in this market are yours. I will need your help with resolving your markets since it’s quite a lot.
@Lemming https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-857866 https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/missile-impact-near-strategic-electrical-facility-in-south-causes-outages/
https://www.jns.org/iranian-missile-launched-at-central-israel-intercepted/
"The Israel Electric Corporation says that due to an Iranian ballistic missile impact near a “strategic infrastructure facility” in southern Israel, there are power disruptions in several towns in the area."
@Samaritan this market should be concluded in Jan 1 2026 regardless of events.
How the various bets will be resolved depends on the wording. Every bet has a different creator, and I will ask each of them to resolve it.
Do you have a question regarding a specific bet?
@Samaritan regarding to my own bets, I will resolve YES if the event happened from the bet’s creation to the market’s deadline.
@JoshuaWilkes June 2025 is over?
Edit: you know what, I'm just dumb, ofc if the ceasefire holds it'll resolve YES.
I wish there was a feature to spin off these props by the creator into their own market instead of having to navigate here and search for them each time. Or the viewer has the option to mark it in a way where it gets its own page to track independently of other bets.
I'm lookin at Netanyahu is replaced for any reason (no longer acting prime minister) and it's a pain each time to see if anyone has bet on it.
Hopefully it is okay to share here, but I have another prop bet market for world conflicts outside of just the Iran-Israel war for those interested:
https://manifold.markets/BlackCrusade/world-conflict-prop-bets-20252027?r=QmxhY2tDcnVzYWRl
I don’t think most traders here get how likely this has become post-war.
Reasoning: gov’t is getting close to its end, ruling coalition likely to use the war for favorable election framing.


