Annual rate of controversies related to lack of edit history
5
330Ṁ46
resolved Jan 19
Resolved
17

This market is active until Manifolds starts showing edit history for market descriptions, or the end of 2023, whichever is earlier.

The market resolves to the number of controversies related to the lack of such edit history which happened while the market was active, divided by duration this market was active (in years).

Example of such controversy: /DesTiny/will-brazil-score-3-or-more-goals-a.

Previous market about such controversies: /IsaacKing/will-a-lack-of-edit-history-lead-to

Multiple controversies involving the same market creator count as one, even if an alt account was used.

Please link all such controversies in the comments below. I may unintentionally ignore any controversies which were not posted in the comments. This shall not count as an improper resolution.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

⚠Unreceptive to pings ; AFK Creator

📢Resolved to 7 : Amount posted in description and comments combined.
if this is incorrect it can be fixed ; ancient market from 2022.

@SirCryptomind It should be 7 divided by 0.4 years (creation date to edit history introduction on May 4 = 5 months), so 17 (rounded).

@jack 👍


@Jenny
Can you resolve, please?

@traders Any proof?

predictedLOWER

predictedLOWER

@Yev So May 4, 2023 should be the close for this market

Does this count?

@CollectedOverSpread There's no significant disagreement over what the description used to say, so I don't think so.

predictedLOWER

I'm not sure if this one should count.

@Yev What did it say before the edit?

Here's one

Related:

I wouldn't call it a controversy since Manifold seems to be fine with this kind of thing, but here's an example of someone editing a question to say something substantially different in a way that isn't verifiable after the fact because there's no edit history.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules