What conspiracy theories will be proven correct by 2100. The conspiracy theory must have been true in 2024 so if the US government gets aliens after 2024 but didn't have them before it doesn't count. Please add your own conspiracy theories. I will be lenient in what is considered a conspiracy theory. If something is widely considered to be true in 2100 it will count as a yes resolution but to resolve beforehand it must be definitively proven and verified by multiple news sources. anything not proven true by 2100 will resolve no. Feel free to ask clarifying questions. In will not bet on this market in case of controversy
Related questions
@Snarflak this one is clearly true: back in the Middle Ages nobody had ever seen this so-called "melanoma" with a microscope!
@RedRiver @Slackhammer btw in case it wasn't clear this means the YouTube videos being footage of real events, not the YouTube videos existing
@Slackhammer Do you mean the existence of the effect (guaranteed true but not really a conspiracy) or the truth of every example belief described as such (guaranteed false)?
@Vesperstelo I'm assuming this means regarding that female game developer being in a relationship with the journalist reviewing her game?
@TheAllMemeingEye this one needs to stipulate something like "was this true as of 2020? was this true as of 2030?" because it seems possible that it will BECOME true at some point despite all "they're listening to us!" claims having been false at some earlier point.
@JamesF what qualifiés for this as true? There are already extremely successful treatments for certain cancers, does it have to be a cure for all cancers or just one type is enough?
@traders let me know if you want to give me liquidity on any of my NOs by betting no or setting a no limit order.
Research has shown that exposure to atrazine can affect the development and hormonal systems of amphibians, including frogs. Some of the documented effects include alterations in the production and regulation of hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone, which are crucial for reproductive development and behavior.
However, this is not "converting testosterone to estrigen" and there's no evidence that this leads to homosexual tendencies.
@Daniel_MC to be clear, I like your comment, it's just that the point of this market is people pretending to believe stuff so stupid than nobody could possibly actually hold that belief...
@Daniel_MC Hey Danny Mac
it’s for jokes
We play the diqwad but we still be wise and shit
Also the first answer you see has already been proven true and it’s still only 90
So like it’s also kinda like a market to show people don’t believe shit with hard evidence to
Word to your mother?
100% 👍
@BrunoParga yeah I made the comment because I remember someone who is pretty reliable saying that there wasn't nothing behind the "they're turning the frogs gay" stuff. So I finally researched it. I thought there was a chance it might be a yes!
@Daniel_MC yeah, this is one that I thought had the most chance of being somewhere in the vicinity of true.