What conspiracy theories will be proven correct by 2100. The conspiracy theory must have been true in 2024 so if the US government gets aliens after 2024 but didn't have them before it doesn't count. Please add your own conspiracy theories. I will be lenient in what is considered a conspiracy theory. If something is widely considered to be true in 2100 it will count as a yes resolution but to resolve beforehand it must be definitively proven and verified by multiple news sources. anything not proven true by 2100 will resolve no. Feel free to ask clarifying questions. In will not bet on this market in case of controversy
Related questions
Research has shown that exposure to atrazine can affect the development and hormonal systems of amphibians, including frogs. Some of the documented effects include alterations in the production and regulation of hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone, which are crucial for reproductive development and behavior.
However, this is not "converting testosterone to estrigen" and there's no evidence that this leads to homosexual tendencies.
@Daniel_MC to be clear, I like your comment, it's just that the point of this market is people pretending to believe stuff so stupid than nobody could possibly actually hold that belief...
@Daniel_MC Hey Danny Mac
it’s for jokes
We play the diqwad but we still be wise and shit
Also the first answer you see has already been proven true and it’s still only 90
So like it’s also kinda like a market to show people don’t believe shit with hard evidence to
Word to your mother?
100% 👍
@BrunoParga yeah I made the comment because I remember someone who is pretty reliable saying that there wasn't nothing behind the "they're turning the frogs gay" stuff. So I finally researched it. I thought there was a chance it might be a yes!
@Daniel_MC yeah, this is one that I thought had the most chance of being somewhere in the vicinity of true.
"It was an expression of speech"
If this is not the standard of proof, nothing is real.
Mile Hile Club:
You've got 1 shot
1 opportunity
Tiffany Gomas or Taylor Swift.
https://manifold.markets/eaglescout/is-tiffany-gomas-objectively-hotter
You can play Minecraft with either one of them in a bathroom stall or whatever else your little 💚 desires
🐍 🔦
@fire dude why do you keep getting banned, making alt accounts, then tagging me with random stuff in random markets lol?
For the record, hotness is about as non-objective as traits get lmao, but based on my quick search of what Tiffany Gomas is known for (the plane freakout video), I guess Taylor Swift would prob win subjectively due to not being unhinged lol
Hot sex for your pleasure, set it off
Liquid treasures floatin' in the loft
I'm in the mood, I'm in the mood to lick you
And let my tongue explore all up in you
The actual conspiracy is the fake belief that rationalussy isn't real caused by Manifold censorship (proven here: https://manifold.markets/ButtocksCocktoasten/is-manifold-trying-to-censor-ration?r=QnV0dG9ja3NDb2NrdG9hc3Rlbg )
...