Will 9/11 conspiracy be confirmed by 2035?

Ṁ1kṀ7.1k

resolved Jan 13

Resolved

N/A

ALL

Will there be documents declassified and/or irreversible proof found that the twin towers didn't fall only due to the airplanes crash, but there were explosives involved.

Market context

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

Which conspiracies will be confirmed in the NYT before 2040?

Will there be a terrorist attack deadlier than 9/11 before 2035

34% chance

Will some kind of "9/11 but with ships" event happen by the end of 2030?

20% chance

Will any of these unhinged conspiracy theories turn out to be true by 2040?

Will Planet 9's existence be verified by 2030?

20% chance

What conspiracy theories not included in the linked market will be proven true by 2100?

Will any current or former president of the United States be assassinated before 2030?

15% chance

Will there be a consensus amongst scholars and historians as to who orchestrated JFK's assassination by 2030?

58% chance

Will there be a terrorist attack deadlier than October 7th before 2030

44% chance

Will any terrorist group detonate a nuclear weapon before 2035?

Sort by:

Looks like this market was not about facts, but about the inner workings of a conspiracy theorist's mind. In any case, it makes no sense to resolve it by percentage if the timeline is until 2035.

@mods

misresolved

After thoroughly reviewing the UAF study I decided to resolve the question as partial (60%) yes. The fall of WTC 7 is unique world-wide and most solid part of the conspiracy.

@TomasPlachy Can you please expand on that? Why would you resolve to percentage when the deadline is 2035?

This poll is not ideal because it excludes the directed energy hypothesis of Judy Wood.

The study of Alaska Fairbanks University confirmed that WTC 7 did not collapsed due to fires. The controlled demolition aspect of 9/11 is pretty much confirmed.

@MetonJoffilyMeToOns lmao put your mana on it, i'll take all of it at 20%

@dgga do you know the study I'm talking about?

@MetonJoffilyMeToOns not specifically but I am overall very much confident enough that I do not even need to know the study you are talking about to put my life savings on a 20% NO limit order

bought Ṁ100 YES

@dgga That's called ignorance ;)

@MetonJoffilyMeToOns ignoring the mountains of contrary proof is called ignorance ;)

@dgga There's a mountain of evidence for the controlled demolition hypothesis from A&E for 9/11 truth and the study from UAF. Building 7 is just obvious because its symmetrical, straight down and in free-fall. So it goes against the laws of physics ...