
Will GPT-4 be able to answer rules questions about Magic: The Gathering well enough to be useful?
38
690Ṁ1806resolved Apr 5
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
It does not have to be as good as I described here. It just needs to be good enough that I judge it at least somewhat useful for some task. This could include:
Answering simple questions to help people learn how to play.
Provide a mostly-correct answer to a hard question, that a human can then edit to be completely correct.
Rephrasing a rule in different terms that are easier to understand.
Helping people find a rule they're looking for, by describing the rule and GPT-4 gives them the number.
Doing any of the above correctly enough of the time that it's better for the user to try GPT-4 and then double-check an answer that seems likely to be wrong, rather than not using it at all.
ChatGPT abysmally fails all of these.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ207 | |
2 | Ṁ196 | |
3 | Ṁ177 | |
4 | Ṁ114 | |
5 | Ṁ49 |
People are also trading
Related questions
Will GPT-5 like to delve?
30% chance
Will AI be passable at answering Magic: The Gathering rules questions before 2030?
88% chance
Will GPT-5 not be terrible at the "Numbers Game"?
90% chance
Will GPT-5 be able to GM a session of my custom TTRPG to my satisfaction?
23% chance
Will GPT-5 be at least a tiny bit strategic at the "Numbers Game"?
82% chance
Will GPT-5 have Atari skills?
23% chance
Will AI reach human-level performance in Magic: The Gathering before 2026?
14% chance
Will GPT-5 ace exams?
76% chance
Will GPT-5 be capable of some form of online learning?
27% chance
Will AI be superhuman at MTG rules by the end of 2030?
79% chance