If any non-bot participant placs one or more bets on YES that total more than Ṁ50, I reserve the right to resolve the market to either N/A or to NO, in whatever way best punishes the user(s) who placed those invalid bets.
All my markets of this type with various maximum mana investments:
Oh god, what is even going on here. I stopped paying attention to this market for a while. How does it have 134 traders‽
probably because it was trending. it is the inevitable fate of a meta market is to attract a lot of activity 😔
few people know how to forecast but everyone knows how to pump ponzis / prisoner's dilemmas
If the market resolves to NO, I'll tip M$52 to the first non-bot account to bet M$51 on YES.
Edit: I'll tip M$60.
How can M71 of profit be compared to you who have 1,000 shares of NO?
@XComhghall The description specifically says “If any non-bot participant placs one or more bets on YES that total more than Ṁ50”. The title says “this market resolves to yes. max position…”, referring to the maximum stake someone can have on the market resolving to yes.
@ms The title specifically says “Max position Ṁ50 per person”, referring to the maximum stake someone can have on the market. The description says “If any non-bot participant placs one or more bets on YES …”, reiterating the maximum stake someone can have on the market resolving to yes.
If this markets ends up resolving NO, I'll tip M$10 to the first person who made a single YES bet of >M$50.
Clearly YES is more punishing. Besides, you may be flagged for resolving incorrectly if you resolve to NO. The guidelines have been updated.
@IsaacKing Do you want to punish the holders of YES with >M$50 positions? If so, the holders of NO can lawfully manipulate the market participants into holding >M$50 of YES and suffering more from the market resolving to No then from the market resolving to N/A. Which I think is the stable equilibrium here.