
2022 would resolve as OpenAI, Deepmind, ???
**revised: OpenAI, Stability.AI, Deepmind
Based on social media buzz, search trends, etc. — i.e. purely on buzz/prestige
50/30/20 resolution to the most impactful in public opinion during the year
People are also trading
Kimi/Moonshot seems pretty promising, regardless. It's odd - to a few Internet friends I have in China, DeepSeek is just one AI company that faces steep competition from several other Chinese labs, but in the West it's gotten the vast majority of the attention.
Not an expert in the field by any means, but these benchmarks seem pretty impressive - https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-k1.5
@redcathode okay, looks like there was just no liquidity/orders. fixed it by placing a no limit order and then buying the opposite side from myself? hopefully it'll get more attention, at least
See Google Trends
US: last year
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=ChatGPT,Deepseek,Gemini,Claude,Grok
Worldwide: last 90 days
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%203-m&q=ChatGPT,Deepseek,Gemini,Claude,Grok
As of now it's clearly
ChatGPT + Deepseek on Jan 28th (only because of NVDA stock)
Deepseek (deflated due to lack of servers) + Gemini (mostly due to integration into android + Google)
Grok (rising with Grok 3 release + integration to X)
Claude (may rise with release of Claude 4)
@ChinmayTheMathGuy I think OpenAI will be first as long as GPT-5 gets released by the end of the year, which seems pretty likely: https://manifold.markets/ManifoldAI/when-will-openai-broadly-release-th.
Is there a way to get the 4 huggingfaces combined?
@Gigacasting Could you edit the "Deepmind" entry to be Google Deepmind? Right now there's "Deepmind", which seems to be heavily traded, and way down there is "Google". Probably the "Google" one should N/A so there isn't confusion.
@ChrisPrichard Done. Unfortunately Gigacasting has left manifold for many months. Imo the market should be taken over by mods and we should clarify the resolution criteria because they are very subjective and the market creator is probably not going to return
@Bayesian Oh yeah - given the subjective nature here,the resolution is a bit of a mess if there isn't one disinterested party.
@jim How do you know gigacasting is active? If it's because it says he bet recently that is not reliable info, check the markets in question and his bets aren't there