During which 5 year period will the world get fusion?

1kṀ635

2055

0.6%

Other

Never

2021-2025

2026-2030

12%

2031-2035

16%

2036-2040

39%

2041-2045

13%

2046-2050

2051-2055

2050-2075

Using https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/your-book-review-the-future-of-fusion as a guide, where he suggests: "By ‘get fusion’, I mean Q > 5 for a steady state experiment. If it is not steady state (e.g. inertial confinement fusion), then I also require a shot frequency of at least 1/second. Anyone selling fusion power to the grid also counts, even if they don't meet these technical requirements." Market will resolve to 'never' if we reach 2055 without fusion meeting the above requirements.

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

What year do we get fusion reactors?

Will we get fusion reactors before 2026?

3% chance

When will fusion power become viable?

2041

Will we get fusion reactors before 2035?

51% chance

Will fusion power be commercially available by 2050?

64% chance

Will we get fusion reactors before 2040?

64% chance

Will fusion power be commercially available by 2045?

66% chance

Will fusion power be commercially available by 2035?

28% chance

Will we get fusion reactors before 2041?

68% chance

Will we get fusion reactors before 2036?

Sort by:

For inertial confinement fusion experiments, the Q factor is often misleadingly reported as fusion energy released divided by the laser energy delivered to the pellet, ignoring the 1% efficiency of the lasers, making the Q-factor look 2 orders of magnitude higher than it really is. I want a clarification that these shenanigans will not count towards a yes resolution.

@JonathanRay subject to that stipulation, I'd bet "Never" up to 50%+

None of the above.

@VoyagerRock didn't read the "5 year period" part oops

@BruceGrugett The question isn't inquiring about the economic breakeven point (which in part depends on the efficiency of all other methods of power generation as well). It's Q > 5, which seems pretty achievable as we've been reaching higher Q values steadily (albeit slowly) for decades without any signs of the trend stopping. The capital investments into the next round of experiments to go further have already been made - so you've effectively betting that not only will they not produce the expected results, they will discover a theoretical hurdle that bars it from ever being a reality. That seems . . . improbable, to say the least.

One sec while I go look up when ITER is supposed to be fully operational . . .

@AndrewHartman Yeah that's what my best guess is based on! I'd be thrilled if that's where we get it :)

@EliGaultney I don't think it is going to happen. It will be way too expensive to make it commercially viable. I think we will realize that and give up on fusion again because we will want to spend the money on something else.