
Resolves yes even if covid-19 exists, just not with an official pandemic status
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ196 | |
2 | Ṁ143 | |
3 | Ṁ121 | |
4 | Ṁ114 | |
5 | Ṁ73 |
People are also trading
“The emergency phase is over, but Covid is not,”
On May 5, 2023, The World Health Organization declared the global aspect of the disease to be over and there is no more emergency worldwide
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/who-ends-covid-global-health-emergency-rcna83046
The statement represents a major step towards ending the pandemic and comes three years after it first declared its highest level of alert over the pandemic
Although: "The WHO does not declare the beginning or end of pandemics, although it did start using the term for COVID in March 2020."
It's only a matter of time before we dip below the threshold for calling it a pandemic, and I'm pretty confident the WHO will declare it so not long after: https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer
@firstuserhere What is that threshold? @Dreamingpast would you agree with that as a more precise resolution rule?