Resolves to the amount of time between the liftoff of the Starship and the Starship either landing or exploding. This refers to the Starship itself, not the booster. If a flight is scheduled but is scrubbed before liftoff, or if it reaches ignition but does not lift off the pad, then that test does not count for the purposes of this market.
Market to be extended until a flight happens or SpaceX announces the Starship will never be launched.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ254 | |
2 | Ṁ204 | |
3 | Ṁ198 | |
4 | Ṁ180 | |
5 | Ṁ168 |
People are also trading
@BoltonBailey Not seeing any reporting to disconfirm this, so I'm resolving. If something changes lmk and I'll try to reresolve.
Can compare with the flight test timeline at https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-2
@BoltonBailey FTS took about 40 seconds to cause explosion which was way too long and the system has been beefed up to cause more immediate explosion. So 3 minutes 10 seconds to 3 minutes 20 seconds might be better as a reference data point.
Stage separation didn't happen last time because ship couldn't reach landing area. I wonder if they will do that contingency differently this time, e.g. do the separation then either abort or command a flip to slow it down so debris doesn't go outside reserved danger areas then abort. Latter could possibly take it beyond 4 minutes, but with hot staging at 2 min 41 sec that seems doubtful?
Anyway hot staging probably riskier than IFT1 and in the 1-4 minute time.
Planned timeline for the previous launch courtesy of wikipedia:
00:00:00 Liftoff
00:00:55 Max q
00:02:49 Main engine cutoff
00:02:52 Stage separation
00:02:57 Starship ignition
00:03:11 Booster boostback burn startup
00:04:06 Booster boostback burn shutdown
00:07:32 Booster is transonic
00:07:40 Booster landing burn startup
00:08:03 Booster splashdown
00:09:20 Starship engine cutoff (SECO)
01:17:21 Starship atmospheric re-entry interface
01:28:43 Starship is transonic
01:30:00 Starship Pacific impact
I guess in the 15m–1h window, you could destruction due to early re-entry? I would imagine they'd probably blow it up right after SECO if it's not on a nominal trajectory though.
@chrisjbillington timeline for this flight at
https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-2
is fairly similar