Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2024?
47
197
Ṁ21KṀ910
resolved Jan 2
Resolved
NO1D
1W
1M
ALL
English Wikipedia, mainspace. If the human can review the edit and choose to stop it before it's published, then it doesn't count.
Get Ṁ200 play money
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ301 | |
2 | Ṁ58 | |
3 | Ṁ32 | |
4 | Ṁ24 | |
5 | Ṁ18 |
Sort by:
@BenjaminIkuta Doesn't seem like it. The sooner you resolve the better since people can make last minute profits before the end of the season.
@BenjaminIkuta Yeah basically Meta's attempt to control the narrative and hold further leverage over news outlets by creating an AI-based way to suggest source improvements to Wikipedia. It's not automated now as you can see, but hypothetically could be if they decided to unleash that beast.
Related questions
Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2040?
75% chance
Will GPT, or AI systems that have GPT as their main component, become as reliably factual as Wikipedia, before 2026?
57% chance
Will the number of active English Wikipedia editors increase by 2030?
32% chance
Will an AI-generated paper be accepted into Nature by 2025?
32% chance
Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2050?
78% chance
Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2025?
27% chance
Will an AI be able to write a passable novel before October 2024?
7% chance
Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2026?
47% chance
Will a purely AI-based news agency exist by the year 2030?
81% chance
Will an AI generate a blog post indistinguishable from Robin Hanson's writing if tested before 2026?
70% chance