Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2024?

Ṁ910Ṁ21k

resolved Jan 2

Resolved

ALL

English Wikipedia, mainspace. If the human can review the edit and choose to stop it before it's published, then it doesn't count.

Market context

Wikipedia

New Year's Resolutions 2024

Get

1,000

to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#	Trader	Total profit
1		Ṁ301
2		Ṁ58
3		Ṁ32
4		Ṁ24
5		Ṁ18

People are also trading

Will Wikipedia accept prediction markets as a source before 2030?

20% chance

Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2040?

72% chance

Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2030?

68% chance

Will AI be successfully editing Wikipedia unassisted, adding substantive original cited prose, before 2050?

84% chance

Before 2027, will there be an AI-written competitor to Wikipedia which I prefer over 2024 Wikipedia?

22% chance

By the end of 2028 will AI be able to write an original article and get it accepted in a prestigious Philosophy journal?

37% chance

Will an AI be able to write a passable novel before 2028?

67% chance

Will I be mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article before 2028?

16% chance

Will Wikipedia still exist in 2100?

67% chance

Will there be a major decentralized Wikipedia competitor before 2031?

Sort by:

Any objection to resolving this NO?

@BenjaminIkuta Doesn't seem like it. The sooner you resolve the better since people can make last minute profits before the end of the season.

Was this market inspired by: https://verifier.sideeditor.com/ ?

@PatrickDelaney No, I hadn't heard of it.

@BenjaminIkuta Yeah basically Meta's attempt to control the narrative and hold further leverage over news outlets by creating an AI-based way to suggest source improvements to Wikipedia. It's not automated now as you can see, but hypothetically could be if they decided to unleash that beast.